A Quality, Benefit, Cost, and Financial Framework for Health Information Technology, E-Prescribing

A Delphi Study

Paul R. DeMuro, Joan Ash, Blackford Middleton, Justin Fletcher, Cecelia J. Madison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little research has been conducted about the quality, benefits, costs, and financial considerations associated with health information technology (HIT), particularly informatics technologies, such as e-prescribing, from the perspective of all its stakeholders.

OBJECTIVES: This research effort sought to identify the stakeholders involved in e-prescribing and to identify and rank-order the positives and the negatives from the perspective of the stakeholders to create a framework to assist in the development of incentives and payment mechanisms which result in better managed care.

METHODS: The Delphi method was employed by enlisting a panel of experts. They were presented with the results of initial research in an online survey of questions which sought to prioritize the quality, benefit, cost, and financial effects of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. From the results of this study, a framework was presented to framework experts.

RESULTS: The experts added stakeholders and positives and negatives to the initial lists and rank-ordered the positives and negatives of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. The aggregate results were summarized by category of stakeholder. The framework experts evaluated the framework.

CONCLUSIONS: Positives and negatives can be rank-ordered from the perspective of each stakeholder. A useful framework was created.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-75
Number of pages7
JournalStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume241
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Electronic Prescribing
Delphi Technique
Medical Informatics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Information technology
Health
Research
Costs
Informatics
Managed Care Programs
Motivation
Technology

Keywords

  • care teams
  • Delphi method
  • e-prescribing
  • frameworks
  • Health information technology
  • informatics
  • managed care
  • quality
  • stakeholders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

A Quality, Benefit, Cost, and Financial Framework for Health Information Technology, E-Prescribing : A Delphi Study. / DeMuro, Paul R.; Ash, Joan; Middleton, Blackford; Fletcher, Justin; Madison, Cecelia J.

In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 241, 01.01.2017, p. 69-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DeMuro, Paul R. ; Ash, Joan ; Middleton, Blackford ; Fletcher, Justin ; Madison, Cecelia J. / A Quality, Benefit, Cost, and Financial Framework for Health Information Technology, E-Prescribing : A Delphi Study. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2017 ; Vol. 241. pp. 69-75.
@article{65d06ad19ad84c2ba87316077e434c8a,
title = "A Quality, Benefit, Cost, and Financial Framework for Health Information Technology, E-Prescribing: A Delphi Study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Little research has been conducted about the quality, benefits, costs, and financial considerations associated with health information technology (HIT), particularly informatics technologies, such as e-prescribing, from the perspective of all its stakeholders.OBJECTIVES: This research effort sought to identify the stakeholders involved in e-prescribing and to identify and rank-order the positives and the negatives from the perspective of the stakeholders to create a framework to assist in the development of incentives and payment mechanisms which result in better managed care.METHODS: The Delphi method was employed by enlisting a panel of experts. They were presented with the results of initial research in an online survey of questions which sought to prioritize the quality, benefit, cost, and financial effects of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. From the results of this study, a framework was presented to framework experts.RESULTS: The experts added stakeholders and positives and negatives to the initial lists and rank-ordered the positives and negatives of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. The aggregate results were summarized by category of stakeholder. The framework experts evaluated the framework.CONCLUSIONS: Positives and negatives can be rank-ordered from the perspective of each stakeholder. A useful framework was created.",
keywords = "care teams, Delphi method, e-prescribing, frameworks, Health information technology, informatics, managed care, quality, stakeholders",
author = "DeMuro, {Paul R.} and Joan Ash and Blackford Middleton and Justin Fletcher and Madison, {Cecelia J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "241",
pages = "69--75",
journal = "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics",
issn = "0926-9630",
publisher = "IOS Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Quality, Benefit, Cost, and Financial Framework for Health Information Technology, E-Prescribing

T2 - A Delphi Study

AU - DeMuro, Paul R.

AU - Ash, Joan

AU - Middleton, Blackford

AU - Fletcher, Justin

AU - Madison, Cecelia J.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Little research has been conducted about the quality, benefits, costs, and financial considerations associated with health information technology (HIT), particularly informatics technologies, such as e-prescribing, from the perspective of all its stakeholders.OBJECTIVES: This research effort sought to identify the stakeholders involved in e-prescribing and to identify and rank-order the positives and the negatives from the perspective of the stakeholders to create a framework to assist in the development of incentives and payment mechanisms which result in better managed care.METHODS: The Delphi method was employed by enlisting a panel of experts. They were presented with the results of initial research in an online survey of questions which sought to prioritize the quality, benefit, cost, and financial effects of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. From the results of this study, a framework was presented to framework experts.RESULTS: The experts added stakeholders and positives and negatives to the initial lists and rank-ordered the positives and negatives of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. The aggregate results were summarized by category of stakeholder. The framework experts evaluated the framework.CONCLUSIONS: Positives and negatives can be rank-ordered from the perspective of each stakeholder. A useful framework was created.

AB - BACKGROUND: Little research has been conducted about the quality, benefits, costs, and financial considerations associated with health information technology (HIT), particularly informatics technologies, such as e-prescribing, from the perspective of all its stakeholders.OBJECTIVES: This research effort sought to identify the stakeholders involved in e-prescribing and to identify and rank-order the positives and the negatives from the perspective of the stakeholders to create a framework to assist in the development of incentives and payment mechanisms which result in better managed care.METHODS: The Delphi method was employed by enlisting a panel of experts. They were presented with the results of initial research in an online survey of questions which sought to prioritize the quality, benefit, cost, and financial effects of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. From the results of this study, a framework was presented to framework experts.RESULTS: The experts added stakeholders and positives and negatives to the initial lists and rank-ordered the positives and negatives of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. The aggregate results were summarized by category of stakeholder. The framework experts evaluated the framework.CONCLUSIONS: Positives and negatives can be rank-ordered from the perspective of each stakeholder. A useful framework was created.

KW - care teams

KW - Delphi method

KW - e-prescribing

KW - frameworks

KW - Health information technology

KW - informatics

KW - managed care

KW - quality

KW - stakeholders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045868498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045868498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 241

SP - 69

EP - 75

JO - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

JF - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

SN - 0926-9630

ER -