A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support

Recommended practices for success

Adam Wright, Joan Ash, Jessica L. Erickson, Joe Wasserman, Arwen Bunce, Ana Stanescu, Daniel St Hilaire, Morgan Panzenhagen, Eric Gebhardt, Carmit McMullen, Blackford Middleton, Dean F. Sittig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support (CDS) at leading sites. Materials and methods: We conducted ethnographic observations at seven diverse sites with a history of excellence in CDS using the Rapid Assessment Process and analyzed the data using a series of card sorts, informed by Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model. Results: We identified 18 activities and grouped them into four areas. Area 1: Fostering relationships across the organization, with activities (a) training and support, (b) visibility/presence on the floor, (c) liaising between people, (d) administration and leadership, (e) project management, (f ) cheerleading/buy-in/sponsorship, (g) preparing for CDS implementation. Area 2: Assembling the system with activities (a) providing technical support, (b) CDS content development, (c) purchasing products from vendors (d) knowledge management, (e) system integration. Area 3: Using CDS to achieve the organization's goals with activities (a) reporting, (b) requirements-gathering/specifications, (c) monitoring CDS, (d) linking CDS to goals, (e) managing data. Area 4: Participation in external policy and standards activities (this area consists of only a single activity). We also identified a set of recommendations associated with these 18 activities. Discussion: All 18 activities we identified were performed at all sites, although the way they were organized into roles differed substantially. We consider these activities critical to the success of a CDS program. Conclusions: A series of activities are performed by sites strong in CDS, and sites adopting CDS should ensure they incorporate these activities into their efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)464-472
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Clinical Decision Support Systems
Organizations
Systems Integration
Knowledge Management
Training Support
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Foster Home Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support : Recommended practices for success. / Wright, Adam; Ash, Joan; Erickson, Jessica L.; Wasserman, Joe; Bunce, Arwen; Stanescu, Ana; St Hilaire, Daniel; Panzenhagen, Morgan; Gebhardt, Eric; McMullen, Carmit; Middleton, Blackford; Sittig, Dean F.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2014, p. 464-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wright, A, Ash, J, Erickson, JL, Wasserman, J, Bunce, A, Stanescu, A, St Hilaire, D, Panzenhagen, M, Gebhardt, E, McMullen, C, Middleton, B & Sittig, DF 2014, 'A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: Recommended practices for success', Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 464-472. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771
Wright, Adam ; Ash, Joan ; Erickson, Jessica L. ; Wasserman, Joe ; Bunce, Arwen ; Stanescu, Ana ; St Hilaire, Daniel ; Panzenhagen, Morgan ; Gebhardt, Eric ; McMullen, Carmit ; Middleton, Blackford ; Sittig, Dean F. / A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support : Recommended practices for success. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 464-472.
@article{beaa1837d23e4a93b07acaae611fac73,
title = "A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: Recommended practices for success",
abstract = "Objective: To describe the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support (CDS) at leading sites. Materials and methods: We conducted ethnographic observations at seven diverse sites with a history of excellence in CDS using the Rapid Assessment Process and analyzed the data using a series of card sorts, informed by Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model. Results: We identified 18 activities and grouped them into four areas. Area 1: Fostering relationships across the organization, with activities (a) training and support, (b) visibility/presence on the floor, (c) liaising between people, (d) administration and leadership, (e) project management, (f ) cheerleading/buy-in/sponsorship, (g) preparing for CDS implementation. Area 2: Assembling the system with activities (a) providing technical support, (b) CDS content development, (c) purchasing products from vendors (d) knowledge management, (e) system integration. Area 3: Using CDS to achieve the organization's goals with activities (a) reporting, (b) requirements-gathering/specifications, (c) monitoring CDS, (d) linking CDS to goals, (e) managing data. Area 4: Participation in external policy and standards activities (this area consists of only a single activity). We also identified a set of recommendations associated with these 18 activities. Discussion: All 18 activities we identified were performed at all sites, although the way they were organized into roles differed substantially. We consider these activities critical to the success of a CDS program. Conclusions: A series of activities are performed by sites strong in CDS, and sites adopting CDS should ensure they incorporate these activities into their efforts.",
author = "Adam Wright and Joan Ash and Erickson, {Jessica L.} and Joe Wasserman and Arwen Bunce and Ana Stanescu and {St Hilaire}, Daniel and Morgan Panzenhagen and Eric Gebhardt and Carmit McMullen and Blackford Middleton and Sittig, {Dean F.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "464--472",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support

T2 - Recommended practices for success

AU - Wright, Adam

AU - Ash, Joan

AU - Erickson, Jessica L.

AU - Wasserman, Joe

AU - Bunce, Arwen

AU - Stanescu, Ana

AU - St Hilaire, Daniel

AU - Panzenhagen, Morgan

AU - Gebhardt, Eric

AU - McMullen, Carmit

AU - Middleton, Blackford

AU - Sittig, Dean F.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: To describe the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support (CDS) at leading sites. Materials and methods: We conducted ethnographic observations at seven diverse sites with a history of excellence in CDS using the Rapid Assessment Process and analyzed the data using a series of card sorts, informed by Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model. Results: We identified 18 activities and grouped them into four areas. Area 1: Fostering relationships across the organization, with activities (a) training and support, (b) visibility/presence on the floor, (c) liaising between people, (d) administration and leadership, (e) project management, (f ) cheerleading/buy-in/sponsorship, (g) preparing for CDS implementation. Area 2: Assembling the system with activities (a) providing technical support, (b) CDS content development, (c) purchasing products from vendors (d) knowledge management, (e) system integration. Area 3: Using CDS to achieve the organization's goals with activities (a) reporting, (b) requirements-gathering/specifications, (c) monitoring CDS, (d) linking CDS to goals, (e) managing data. Area 4: Participation in external policy and standards activities (this area consists of only a single activity). We also identified a set of recommendations associated with these 18 activities. Discussion: All 18 activities we identified were performed at all sites, although the way they were organized into roles differed substantially. We consider these activities critical to the success of a CDS program. Conclusions: A series of activities are performed by sites strong in CDS, and sites adopting CDS should ensure they incorporate these activities into their efforts.

AB - Objective: To describe the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support (CDS) at leading sites. Materials and methods: We conducted ethnographic observations at seven diverse sites with a history of excellence in CDS using the Rapid Assessment Process and analyzed the data using a series of card sorts, informed by Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model. Results: We identified 18 activities and grouped them into four areas. Area 1: Fostering relationships across the organization, with activities (a) training and support, (b) visibility/presence on the floor, (c) liaising between people, (d) administration and leadership, (e) project management, (f ) cheerleading/buy-in/sponsorship, (g) preparing for CDS implementation. Area 2: Assembling the system with activities (a) providing technical support, (b) CDS content development, (c) purchasing products from vendors (d) knowledge management, (e) system integration. Area 3: Using CDS to achieve the organization's goals with activities (a) reporting, (b) requirements-gathering/specifications, (c) monitoring CDS, (d) linking CDS to goals, (e) managing data. Area 4: Participation in external policy and standards activities (this area consists of only a single activity). We also identified a set of recommendations associated with these 18 activities. Discussion: All 18 activities we identified were performed at all sites, although the way they were organized into roles differed substantially. We consider these activities critical to the success of a CDS program. Conclusions: A series of activities are performed by sites strong in CDS, and sites adopting CDS should ensure they incorporate these activities into their efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901849519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901849519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771

DO - 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 464

EP - 472

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 3

ER -