A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Conversations in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Olaf P. Geerse, Daniela J. Lamas, Justin J. Sanders, Joanna Paladino, Jane Kavanagh, Natalie J. Henrich, Annette J. Berendsen, Thijo J.N. Hiltermann, Erik Fromme, Rachelle E. Bernacki, Susan D. Block

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Background: Conversations with seriously ill patients about their values and goals have been associated with reduced distress, a better quality of life, and goal-concordant care near the end of life. Yet, little is known about how such conversations are conducted. Objective: To characterize the content of serious illness conversations and identify opportunities for improvement. Design: Qualitative analysis of audio-recorded, serious illness conversations using an evidence-based guide and obtained through a cluster randomized controlled trial in an outpatient oncology setting. Setting/Measurements: Clinicians assigned to the intervention arm received training to use the "Serious Illness Conversation Guide" to have a serious illness conversation about values and goals with advanced cancer patients. Conversations were de-identified, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by two researchers. Key themes were analyzed. Results: A total of 25 conversations conducted by 16 clinicians were evaluated. The median conversation duration was 14 minutes (range 4-37), with clinicians speaking half of the time. Thematic analyses demonstrated five key themes: (1) supportive dialogue between patients and clinicians; (2) patients' openness to discuss emotionally challenging topics; (3) patients' willingness to articulate preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments; (4) clinicians' difficulty in responding to emotional or ambiguous patient statements; and (5) challenges in discussing prognosis. Conclusions: Data from this exploratory study suggest that seriously ill patients are open to discussing values and goals with their clinician. Yet, clinicians may struggle when disclosing a time-based prognosis and in responding to patients' emotions. Such skills should be a focus for additional training for clinicians caring for seriously ill patients.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)773-781
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of palliative medicine
    Volume22
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    Neoplasms
    Terminal Care
    Emotions
    Outpatients
    Randomized Controlled Trials
    Quality of Life
    Research Personnel
    Therapeutics

    Keywords

    • advance care planning
    • neoplasms
    • palliative care
    • qualitative research

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Nursing(all)
    • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

    Cite this

    Geerse, O. P., Lamas, D. J., Sanders, J. J., Paladino, J., Kavanagh, J., Henrich, N. J., ... Block, S. D. (2019). A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Conversations in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Journal of palliative medicine, 22(7), 773-781. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0487

    A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Conversations in Patients with Advanced Cancer. / Geerse, Olaf P.; Lamas, Daniela J.; Sanders, Justin J.; Paladino, Joanna; Kavanagh, Jane; Henrich, Natalie J.; Berendsen, Annette J.; Hiltermann, Thijo J.N.; Fromme, Erik; Bernacki, Rachelle E.; Block, Susan D.

    In: Journal of palliative medicine, Vol. 22, No. 7, 01.07.2019, p. 773-781.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Geerse, OP, Lamas, DJ, Sanders, JJ, Paladino, J, Kavanagh, J, Henrich, NJ, Berendsen, AJ, Hiltermann, TJN, Fromme, E, Bernacki, RE & Block, SD 2019, 'A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Conversations in Patients with Advanced Cancer', Journal of palliative medicine, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 773-781. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0487
    Geerse OP, Lamas DJ, Sanders JJ, Paladino J, Kavanagh J, Henrich NJ et al. A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Conversations in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Journal of palliative medicine. 2019 Jul 1;22(7):773-781. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0487
    Geerse, Olaf P. ; Lamas, Daniela J. ; Sanders, Justin J. ; Paladino, Joanna ; Kavanagh, Jane ; Henrich, Natalie J. ; Berendsen, Annette J. ; Hiltermann, Thijo J.N. ; Fromme, Erik ; Bernacki, Rachelle E. ; Block, Susan D. / A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Conversations in Patients with Advanced Cancer. In: Journal of palliative medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 22, No. 7. pp. 773-781.
    @article{c5b495b3eca340d8b53e874802fd1f58,
    title = "A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Conversations in Patients with Advanced Cancer",
    abstract = "Background: Conversations with seriously ill patients about their values and goals have been associated with reduced distress, a better quality of life, and goal-concordant care near the end of life. Yet, little is known about how such conversations are conducted. Objective: To characterize the content of serious illness conversations and identify opportunities for improvement. Design: Qualitative analysis of audio-recorded, serious illness conversations using an evidence-based guide and obtained through a cluster randomized controlled trial in an outpatient oncology setting. Setting/Measurements: Clinicians assigned to the intervention arm received training to use the {"}Serious Illness Conversation Guide{"} to have a serious illness conversation about values and goals with advanced cancer patients. Conversations were de-identified, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by two researchers. Key themes were analyzed. Results: A total of 25 conversations conducted by 16 clinicians were evaluated. The median conversation duration was 14 minutes (range 4-37), with clinicians speaking half of the time. Thematic analyses demonstrated five key themes: (1) supportive dialogue between patients and clinicians; (2) patients' openness to discuss emotionally challenging topics; (3) patients' willingness to articulate preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments; (4) clinicians' difficulty in responding to emotional or ambiguous patient statements; and (5) challenges in discussing prognosis. Conclusions: Data from this exploratory study suggest that seriously ill patients are open to discussing values and goals with their clinician. Yet, clinicians may struggle when disclosing a time-based prognosis and in responding to patients' emotions. Such skills should be a focus for additional training for clinicians caring for seriously ill patients.",
    keywords = "advance care planning, neoplasms, palliative care, qualitative research",
    author = "Geerse, {Olaf P.} and Lamas, {Daniela J.} and Sanders, {Justin J.} and Joanna Paladino and Jane Kavanagh and Henrich, {Natalie J.} and Berendsen, {Annette J.} and Hiltermann, {Thijo J.N.} and Erik Fromme and Bernacki, {Rachelle E.} and Block, {Susan D.}",
    year = "2019",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1089/jpm.2018.0487",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "773--781",
    journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
    issn = "1096-6218",
    publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
    number = "7",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Conversations in Patients with Advanced Cancer

    AU - Geerse, Olaf P.

    AU - Lamas, Daniela J.

    AU - Sanders, Justin J.

    AU - Paladino, Joanna

    AU - Kavanagh, Jane

    AU - Henrich, Natalie J.

    AU - Berendsen, Annette J.

    AU - Hiltermann, Thijo J.N.

    AU - Fromme, Erik

    AU - Bernacki, Rachelle E.

    AU - Block, Susan D.

    PY - 2019/7/1

    Y1 - 2019/7/1

    N2 - Background: Conversations with seriously ill patients about their values and goals have been associated with reduced distress, a better quality of life, and goal-concordant care near the end of life. Yet, little is known about how such conversations are conducted. Objective: To characterize the content of serious illness conversations and identify opportunities for improvement. Design: Qualitative analysis of audio-recorded, serious illness conversations using an evidence-based guide and obtained through a cluster randomized controlled trial in an outpatient oncology setting. Setting/Measurements: Clinicians assigned to the intervention arm received training to use the "Serious Illness Conversation Guide" to have a serious illness conversation about values and goals with advanced cancer patients. Conversations were de-identified, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by two researchers. Key themes were analyzed. Results: A total of 25 conversations conducted by 16 clinicians were evaluated. The median conversation duration was 14 minutes (range 4-37), with clinicians speaking half of the time. Thematic analyses demonstrated five key themes: (1) supportive dialogue between patients and clinicians; (2) patients' openness to discuss emotionally challenging topics; (3) patients' willingness to articulate preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments; (4) clinicians' difficulty in responding to emotional or ambiguous patient statements; and (5) challenges in discussing prognosis. Conclusions: Data from this exploratory study suggest that seriously ill patients are open to discussing values and goals with their clinician. Yet, clinicians may struggle when disclosing a time-based prognosis and in responding to patients' emotions. Such skills should be a focus for additional training for clinicians caring for seriously ill patients.

    AB - Background: Conversations with seriously ill patients about their values and goals have been associated with reduced distress, a better quality of life, and goal-concordant care near the end of life. Yet, little is known about how such conversations are conducted. Objective: To characterize the content of serious illness conversations and identify opportunities for improvement. Design: Qualitative analysis of audio-recorded, serious illness conversations using an evidence-based guide and obtained through a cluster randomized controlled trial in an outpatient oncology setting. Setting/Measurements: Clinicians assigned to the intervention arm received training to use the "Serious Illness Conversation Guide" to have a serious illness conversation about values and goals with advanced cancer patients. Conversations were de-identified, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by two researchers. Key themes were analyzed. Results: A total of 25 conversations conducted by 16 clinicians were evaluated. The median conversation duration was 14 minutes (range 4-37), with clinicians speaking half of the time. Thematic analyses demonstrated five key themes: (1) supportive dialogue between patients and clinicians; (2) patients' openness to discuss emotionally challenging topics; (3) patients' willingness to articulate preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments; (4) clinicians' difficulty in responding to emotional or ambiguous patient statements; and (5) challenges in discussing prognosis. Conclusions: Data from this exploratory study suggest that seriously ill patients are open to discussing values and goals with their clinician. Yet, clinicians may struggle when disclosing a time-based prognosis and in responding to patients' emotions. Such skills should be a focus for additional training for clinicians caring for seriously ill patients.

    KW - advance care planning

    KW - neoplasms

    KW - palliative care

    KW - qualitative research

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068336386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068336386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2018.0487

    DO - 10.1089/jpm.2018.0487

    M3 - Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 773

    EP - 781

    JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

    JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

    SN - 1096-6218

    IS - 7

    ER -