A qualitative study of rural primary care clinician views on remote monitoring technologies

Melinda Davis, Jillian M. Currey, Sonya Howk, Molly R. Desordi, Linda Boise, Lyle Fagnan, Nancy Vuckovic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Remote monitoring technologies (RMTs) may improve the quality of care, reduce access barriers, and help control medical costs. Despite the role of primary care clinicians as potential key users of RMTs, few studies explore their views. This study explores rural primary care clinician interest and the resources necessary to incorporate RMTs into routine practice. Methods: We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with rural primary care clinician members of the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN) from November 2011 to April 2012. Our multidisciplinary team used thematic analysis to identify emergent themes and a cross-case comparative analysis to explore variation by participant and practice characteristics. Results: Clinicians expressed interest in RMTs most relevant to their clinical practice, such as supporting chronic disease management, noting benefits to patients of all ages. They expressed concern about the quantity of data, patient motivation to utilize equipment, and potential changes to the patient-clinician encounter. Direct data transfer into the clinic's electronic health record (EHR), availability in multiple formats, and review by ancillary staff could facilitate implementation. Although participants acknowledged the potential system-level benefits of using RMTs, adoption would be difficult without payment reform. Conclusions: Adoption of RMTs by rural primary care clinicians may be influenced by equipment purpose and functionality, implementation resources, and payment. Clinician and staff engagement will be critical to actualize RMT use in routine primary care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-78
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Rural Health
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Cost Control
Electronic Health Records
Quality of Health Care
Disease Management
Chronic Disease
Interviews
Research

Keywords

  • E-health
  • In-depth interview
  • Primary care
  • Qualitative research
  • Rural health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A qualitative study of rural primary care clinician views on remote monitoring technologies. / Davis, Melinda; Currey, Jillian M.; Howk, Sonya; Desordi, Molly R.; Boise, Linda; Fagnan, Lyle; Vuckovic, Nancy.

In: Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 30, No. 1, 12.2014, p. 69-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, Melinda ; Currey, Jillian M. ; Howk, Sonya ; Desordi, Molly R. ; Boise, Linda ; Fagnan, Lyle ; Vuckovic, Nancy. / A qualitative study of rural primary care clinician views on remote monitoring technologies. In: Journal of Rural Health. 2014 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 69-78.
@article{f2460c64091b454abbf585120a566e66,
title = "A qualitative study of rural primary care clinician views on remote monitoring technologies",
abstract = "Purpose: Remote monitoring technologies (RMTs) may improve the quality of care, reduce access barriers, and help control medical costs. Despite the role of primary care clinicians as potential key users of RMTs, few studies explore their views. This study explores rural primary care clinician interest and the resources necessary to incorporate RMTs into routine practice. Methods: We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with rural primary care clinician members of the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN) from November 2011 to April 2012. Our multidisciplinary team used thematic analysis to identify emergent themes and a cross-case comparative analysis to explore variation by participant and practice characteristics. Results: Clinicians expressed interest in RMTs most relevant to their clinical practice, such as supporting chronic disease management, noting benefits to patients of all ages. They expressed concern about the quantity of data, patient motivation to utilize equipment, and potential changes to the patient-clinician encounter. Direct data transfer into the clinic's electronic health record (EHR), availability in multiple formats, and review by ancillary staff could facilitate implementation. Although participants acknowledged the potential system-level benefits of using RMTs, adoption would be difficult without payment reform. Conclusions: Adoption of RMTs by rural primary care clinicians may be influenced by equipment purpose and functionality, implementation resources, and payment. Clinician and staff engagement will be critical to actualize RMT use in routine primary care.",
keywords = "E-health, In-depth interview, Primary care, Qualitative research, Rural health",
author = "Melinda Davis and Currey, {Jillian M.} and Sonya Howk and Desordi, {Molly R.} and Linda Boise and Lyle Fagnan and Nancy Vuckovic",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/jrh.12027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "69--78",
journal = "Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "0890-765X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative study of rural primary care clinician views on remote monitoring technologies

AU - Davis, Melinda

AU - Currey, Jillian M.

AU - Howk, Sonya

AU - Desordi, Molly R.

AU - Boise, Linda

AU - Fagnan, Lyle

AU - Vuckovic, Nancy

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - Purpose: Remote monitoring technologies (RMTs) may improve the quality of care, reduce access barriers, and help control medical costs. Despite the role of primary care clinicians as potential key users of RMTs, few studies explore their views. This study explores rural primary care clinician interest and the resources necessary to incorporate RMTs into routine practice. Methods: We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with rural primary care clinician members of the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN) from November 2011 to April 2012. Our multidisciplinary team used thematic analysis to identify emergent themes and a cross-case comparative analysis to explore variation by participant and practice characteristics. Results: Clinicians expressed interest in RMTs most relevant to their clinical practice, such as supporting chronic disease management, noting benefits to patients of all ages. They expressed concern about the quantity of data, patient motivation to utilize equipment, and potential changes to the patient-clinician encounter. Direct data transfer into the clinic's electronic health record (EHR), availability in multiple formats, and review by ancillary staff could facilitate implementation. Although participants acknowledged the potential system-level benefits of using RMTs, adoption would be difficult without payment reform. Conclusions: Adoption of RMTs by rural primary care clinicians may be influenced by equipment purpose and functionality, implementation resources, and payment. Clinician and staff engagement will be critical to actualize RMT use in routine primary care.

AB - Purpose: Remote monitoring technologies (RMTs) may improve the quality of care, reduce access barriers, and help control medical costs. Despite the role of primary care clinicians as potential key users of RMTs, few studies explore their views. This study explores rural primary care clinician interest and the resources necessary to incorporate RMTs into routine practice. Methods: We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with rural primary care clinician members of the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN) from November 2011 to April 2012. Our multidisciplinary team used thematic analysis to identify emergent themes and a cross-case comparative analysis to explore variation by participant and practice characteristics. Results: Clinicians expressed interest in RMTs most relevant to their clinical practice, such as supporting chronic disease management, noting benefits to patients of all ages. They expressed concern about the quantity of data, patient motivation to utilize equipment, and potential changes to the patient-clinician encounter. Direct data transfer into the clinic's electronic health record (EHR), availability in multiple formats, and review by ancillary staff could facilitate implementation. Although participants acknowledged the potential system-level benefits of using RMTs, adoption would be difficult without payment reform. Conclusions: Adoption of RMTs by rural primary care clinicians may be influenced by equipment purpose and functionality, implementation resources, and payment. Clinician and staff engagement will be critical to actualize RMT use in routine primary care.

KW - E-health

KW - In-depth interview

KW - Primary care

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Rural health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891556500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891556500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jrh.12027

DO - 10.1111/jrh.12027

M3 - Article

C2 - 24383486

AN - SCOPUS:84891556500

VL - 30

SP - 69

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Rural Health

JF - Journal of Rural Health

SN - 0890-765X

IS - 1

ER -