A qualitative analysis of how online access to mental health notes is changing clinician perceptions of power and the therapeutic relationship

Lauren M. Denneson, Risa Cromer, Holly B. Williams, Maura Pisciotta, Steven K. Dobscha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Background: As part of the national OpenNotes initiative, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides veterans online access to their clinical progress notes, raising concern in mental health settings. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the perspectives and experiences of mental health clinicians with OpenNotes to better understand how OpenNotes may be affecting mental health care. Methods: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with 28 VHA mental health clinicians and nurses. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach, which allows for both inductive and deductive themes to be explored using an iterative, constant comparative coding process. Results: OpenNotes is changing VHA mental health care in ways that mental health clinicians perceive as both challenging and beneficial. At the heart of these changes is a shifting power distribution within the patient-clinician relationship. Some clinicians view OpenNotes as an opportunity to better partner with patients, whereas others feel that it has the potential to undo the therapeutic relationship. Many clinicians are uncomfortable with OpenNotes, but acknowledge that this discomfort could both improve and diminish care and documentation practices. Specifically, we found that (1) OpenNotes is empowering patients, (2) OpenNotes is affecting how clinicians build and maintain the therapeutic relationship, and (3) mental health clinicians are adjusting their practices to protect patients and themselves from adverse consequences of OpenNotes. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that future research should monitor whether OpenNotes notes facilitates stronger patient-clinician relationships, enhancing patient-centered mental health care, or diminishes the quality of mental health care through disruptions in the therapeutic relationship and reduced documentation.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Article numbere208
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Veterans Health
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Therapeutics
Delivery of Health Care
Documentation
Nurse Clinicians
Power (Psychology)
Quality of Health Care
Veterans
Interviews

Keywords

  • eHealth
  • Mental health
  • Patient-centered care
  • Physician-patient relations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

A qualitative analysis of how online access to mental health notes is changing clinician perceptions of power and the therapeutic relationship. / Denneson, Lauren M.; Cromer, Risa; Williams, Holly B.; Pisciotta, Maura; Dobscha, Steven K.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 19, No. 6, e208, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{60b77ecafaca436886f65acf621f5dcb,
title = "A qualitative analysis of how online access to mental health notes is changing clinician perceptions of power and the therapeutic relationship",
abstract = "Background: As part of the national OpenNotes initiative, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides veterans online access to their clinical progress notes, raising concern in mental health settings. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the perspectives and experiences of mental health clinicians with OpenNotes to better understand how OpenNotes may be affecting mental health care. Methods: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with 28 VHA mental health clinicians and nurses. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach, which allows for both inductive and deductive themes to be explored using an iterative, constant comparative coding process. Results: OpenNotes is changing VHA mental health care in ways that mental health clinicians perceive as both challenging and beneficial. At the heart of these changes is a shifting power distribution within the patient-clinician relationship. Some clinicians view OpenNotes as an opportunity to better partner with patients, whereas others feel that it has the potential to undo the therapeutic relationship. Many clinicians are uncomfortable with OpenNotes, but acknowledge that this discomfort could both improve and diminish care and documentation practices. Specifically, we found that (1) OpenNotes is empowering patients, (2) OpenNotes is affecting how clinicians build and maintain the therapeutic relationship, and (3) mental health clinicians are adjusting their practices to protect patients and themselves from adverse consequences of OpenNotes. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that future research should monitor whether OpenNotes notes facilitates stronger patient-clinician relationships, enhancing patient-centered mental health care, or diminishes the quality of mental health care through disruptions in the therapeutic relationship and reduced documentation.",
keywords = "eHealth, Mental health, Patient-centered care, Physician-patient relations",
author = "Denneson, {Lauren M.} and Risa Cromer and Williams, {Holly B.} and Maura Pisciotta and Dobscha, {Steven K.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.6915",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1438-8871",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative analysis of how online access to mental health notes is changing clinician perceptions of power and the therapeutic relationship

AU - Denneson,Lauren M.

AU - Cromer,Risa

AU - Williams,Holly B.

AU - Pisciotta,Maura

AU - Dobscha,Steven K.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: As part of the national OpenNotes initiative, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides veterans online access to their clinical progress notes, raising concern in mental health settings. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the perspectives and experiences of mental health clinicians with OpenNotes to better understand how OpenNotes may be affecting mental health care. Methods: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with 28 VHA mental health clinicians and nurses. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach, which allows for both inductive and deductive themes to be explored using an iterative, constant comparative coding process. Results: OpenNotes is changing VHA mental health care in ways that mental health clinicians perceive as both challenging and beneficial. At the heart of these changes is a shifting power distribution within the patient-clinician relationship. Some clinicians view OpenNotes as an opportunity to better partner with patients, whereas others feel that it has the potential to undo the therapeutic relationship. Many clinicians are uncomfortable with OpenNotes, but acknowledge that this discomfort could both improve and diminish care and documentation practices. Specifically, we found that (1) OpenNotes is empowering patients, (2) OpenNotes is affecting how clinicians build and maintain the therapeutic relationship, and (3) mental health clinicians are adjusting their practices to protect patients and themselves from adverse consequences of OpenNotes. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that future research should monitor whether OpenNotes notes facilitates stronger patient-clinician relationships, enhancing patient-centered mental health care, or diminishes the quality of mental health care through disruptions in the therapeutic relationship and reduced documentation.

AB - Background: As part of the national OpenNotes initiative, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides veterans online access to their clinical progress notes, raising concern in mental health settings. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the perspectives and experiences of mental health clinicians with OpenNotes to better understand how OpenNotes may be affecting mental health care. Methods: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with 28 VHA mental health clinicians and nurses. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach, which allows for both inductive and deductive themes to be explored using an iterative, constant comparative coding process. Results: OpenNotes is changing VHA mental health care in ways that mental health clinicians perceive as both challenging and beneficial. At the heart of these changes is a shifting power distribution within the patient-clinician relationship. Some clinicians view OpenNotes as an opportunity to better partner with patients, whereas others feel that it has the potential to undo the therapeutic relationship. Many clinicians are uncomfortable with OpenNotes, but acknowledge that this discomfort could both improve and diminish care and documentation practices. Specifically, we found that (1) OpenNotes is empowering patients, (2) OpenNotes is affecting how clinicians build and maintain the therapeutic relationship, and (3) mental health clinicians are adjusting their practices to protect patients and themselves from adverse consequences of OpenNotes. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that future research should monitor whether OpenNotes notes facilitates stronger patient-clinician relationships, enhancing patient-centered mental health care, or diminishes the quality of mental health care through disruptions in the therapeutic relationship and reduced documentation.

KW - eHealth

KW - Mental health

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Physician-patient relations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021782330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021782330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.6915

DO - 10.2196/jmir.6915

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

T2 - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1438-8871

IS - 6

M1 - e208

ER -