A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol

Richard (Rick) Deyo, Sohail K. Mirza, Patrick J. Heagerty, Judith A. Turner, Brook I. Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of discogenic back pain often leads to spinal fusion surgery and may partly explain the recent rapid increase in lumbar fusion operations in the United States. Little is known about how patients undergoing lumbar fusion compare in preoperative physical and psychological function to patients who have degenerative discs, but receive only non-surgical care. Methods: Our group is implementing a multi-center prospective cohort study to compare patients with presumed discogenic pain who undergo lumbar fusion with those who have nonsurgical care. We identify patients with predominant low back pain lasting at least six months, one or two-level disc degeneration confirmed by imaging, and a normal neurological exam. Patients are classified as surgical or non-surgical based on the treatment they receive during the six months following study enrollment. Results: Three hundred patients discogenic low back pain will be followed in a prospective cohort study for two years. The primary outcome measure is the Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire at 24-months. We also evaluate several other dimensions of outcome, including pain, functional status, psychological distress, general well-being, and role disability. Conclusion: The primary aim of this prospective cohort study is to better define the outcomes of lumbar fusion for discogenic back pain as it is practiced in the United States. We additionally aim to identify characteristics that result in better patient selection for surgery. Potential predictors include demographics, work and disability compensation status, initial symptom severity and duration, imaging results, functional status, and psychological distress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number24
JournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 24 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Psychology
Low Back Pain
Therapeutics
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Pain
Spinal Fusion
Patient Selection
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol. / Deyo, Richard (Rick); Mirza, Sohail K.; Heagerty, Patrick J.; Turner, Judith A.; Martin, Brook I.

In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 6, 24, 24.05.2005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Mirza, Sohail K. ; Heagerty, Patrick J. ; Turner, Judith A. ; Martin, Brook I. / A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol. In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2005 ; Vol. 6.
@article{fa269f4984b24b85bac0a26ed754e33e,
title = "A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol",
abstract = "Background: The diagnosis of discogenic back pain often leads to spinal fusion surgery and may partly explain the recent rapid increase in lumbar fusion operations in the United States. Little is known about how patients undergoing lumbar fusion compare in preoperative physical and psychological function to patients who have degenerative discs, but receive only non-surgical care. Methods: Our group is implementing a multi-center prospective cohort study to compare patients with presumed discogenic pain who undergo lumbar fusion with those who have nonsurgical care. We identify patients with predominant low back pain lasting at least six months, one or two-level disc degeneration confirmed by imaging, and a normal neurological exam. Patients are classified as surgical or non-surgical based on the treatment they receive during the six months following study enrollment. Results: Three hundred patients discogenic low back pain will be followed in a prospective cohort study for two years. The primary outcome measure is the Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire at 24-months. We also evaluate several other dimensions of outcome, including pain, functional status, psychological distress, general well-being, and role disability. Conclusion: The primary aim of this prospective cohort study is to better define the outcomes of lumbar fusion for discogenic back pain as it is practiced in the United States. We additionally aim to identify characteristics that result in better patient selection for surgery. Potential predictors include demographics, work and disability compensation status, initial symptom severity and duration, imaging results, functional status, and psychological distress.",
author = "Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Mirza, {Sohail K.} and Heagerty, {Patrick J.} and Turner, {Judith A.} and Martin, {Brook I.}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2474-6-24",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Mirza, Sohail K.

AU - Heagerty, Patrick J.

AU - Turner, Judith A.

AU - Martin, Brook I.

PY - 2005/5/24

Y1 - 2005/5/24

N2 - Background: The diagnosis of discogenic back pain often leads to spinal fusion surgery and may partly explain the recent rapid increase in lumbar fusion operations in the United States. Little is known about how patients undergoing lumbar fusion compare in preoperative physical and psychological function to patients who have degenerative discs, but receive only non-surgical care. Methods: Our group is implementing a multi-center prospective cohort study to compare patients with presumed discogenic pain who undergo lumbar fusion with those who have nonsurgical care. We identify patients with predominant low back pain lasting at least six months, one or two-level disc degeneration confirmed by imaging, and a normal neurological exam. Patients are classified as surgical or non-surgical based on the treatment they receive during the six months following study enrollment. Results: Three hundred patients discogenic low back pain will be followed in a prospective cohort study for two years. The primary outcome measure is the Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire at 24-months. We also evaluate several other dimensions of outcome, including pain, functional status, psychological distress, general well-being, and role disability. Conclusion: The primary aim of this prospective cohort study is to better define the outcomes of lumbar fusion for discogenic back pain as it is practiced in the United States. We additionally aim to identify characteristics that result in better patient selection for surgery. Potential predictors include demographics, work and disability compensation status, initial symptom severity and duration, imaging results, functional status, and psychological distress.

AB - Background: The diagnosis of discogenic back pain often leads to spinal fusion surgery and may partly explain the recent rapid increase in lumbar fusion operations in the United States. Little is known about how patients undergoing lumbar fusion compare in preoperative physical and psychological function to patients who have degenerative discs, but receive only non-surgical care. Methods: Our group is implementing a multi-center prospective cohort study to compare patients with presumed discogenic pain who undergo lumbar fusion with those who have nonsurgical care. We identify patients with predominant low back pain lasting at least six months, one or two-level disc degeneration confirmed by imaging, and a normal neurological exam. Patients are classified as surgical or non-surgical based on the treatment they receive during the six months following study enrollment. Results: Three hundred patients discogenic low back pain will be followed in a prospective cohort study for two years. The primary outcome measure is the Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire at 24-months. We also evaluate several other dimensions of outcome, including pain, functional status, psychological distress, general well-being, and role disability. Conclusion: The primary aim of this prospective cohort study is to better define the outcomes of lumbar fusion for discogenic back pain as it is practiced in the United States. We additionally aim to identify characteristics that result in better patient selection for surgery. Potential predictors include demographics, work and disability compensation status, initial symptom severity and duration, imaging results, functional status, and psychological distress.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23244443062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23244443062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2474-6-24

DO - 10.1186/1471-2474-6-24

M3 - Article

C2 - 15913458

AN - SCOPUS:23244443062

VL - 6

JO - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

SN - 1471-2474

M1 - 24

ER -