A pilot study to explore the safety of perioperative postpyloric enteral nutrition

Lisa M. McElroy, Panna A. Codner, Karen Brasel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The practice of holding enteral nutrition (EN) 8 hours prior to surgery is common. We hypothesized that it was safe to continue postpyloric EN, and we developed an institutional practice pattern to investigate our hypothesis. Methods: Our pilot study included intubated patients in the surgical intensive care unit at Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital who received EN via a nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube and underwent 1 or more surgical procedures. Demographic, illness, and injury information were collected as well as length of time to NJ placement, time to initiation of EN, EN interruptions, and complications. Additional hours of EN were calculated by totaling the number of hours a patient received EN past midnight on the day of surgery. Results: A total of 14 patients with mean (SD) age 44.3 (19.9) were included. Patients had a mean (SD) Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 26.1 (9.2) on admission and underwent a total of 38 operations following placement of a feeding tube. The most frequent operation performed was an orthopedic procedure (n = 17; 46.1%). The mean (SD) length of EN interruptions for a single procedure was 222.4 (206.9) minutes. Patients received an additional 11.9 (4.7) hours of EN over the course of their hospitalization and an additional 1064.9 (490) kcal/d per operation. There were no adverse events. Conclusion: Perioperative continuation of postpyloric EN is feasible in some critically ill surgical patients and can result in additional calories provided. A multidisciplinary approach and an institutional policy can increase the likelihood of meeting nutrition goals in these patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)777-780
Number of pages4
JournalNutrition in Clinical Practice
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Enteral Nutrition
Safety
Institutional Practice
Organizational Policy
Orthopedic Procedures
Injury Severity Score
Critical Care
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Critical Illness
Intensive Care Units
Hospitalization
Demography

Keywords

  • critical illness
  • enteral nutrition
  • multiple trauma
  • nutritional support
  • perioperative period

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

A pilot study to explore the safety of perioperative postpyloric enteral nutrition. / McElroy, Lisa M.; Codner, Panna A.; Brasel, Karen.

In: Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 27, No. 6, 12.2012, p. 777-780.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d3a77a7577a1443782bd1c8258dc3b7a,
title = "A pilot study to explore the safety of perioperative postpyloric enteral nutrition",
abstract = "Background: The practice of holding enteral nutrition (EN) 8 hours prior to surgery is common. We hypothesized that it was safe to continue postpyloric EN, and we developed an institutional practice pattern to investigate our hypothesis. Methods: Our pilot study included intubated patients in the surgical intensive care unit at Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital who received EN via a nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube and underwent 1 or more surgical procedures. Demographic, illness, and injury information were collected as well as length of time to NJ placement, time to initiation of EN, EN interruptions, and complications. Additional hours of EN were calculated by totaling the number of hours a patient received EN past midnight on the day of surgery. Results: A total of 14 patients with mean (SD) age 44.3 (19.9) were included. Patients had a mean (SD) Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 26.1 (9.2) on admission and underwent a total of 38 operations following placement of a feeding tube. The most frequent operation performed was an orthopedic procedure (n = 17; 46.1{\%}). The mean (SD) length of EN interruptions for a single procedure was 222.4 (206.9) minutes. Patients received an additional 11.9 (4.7) hours of EN over the course of their hospitalization and an additional 1064.9 (490) kcal/d per operation. There were no adverse events. Conclusion: Perioperative continuation of postpyloric EN is feasible in some critically ill surgical patients and can result in additional calories provided. A multidisciplinary approach and an institutional policy can increase the likelihood of meeting nutrition goals in these patients.",
keywords = "critical illness, enteral nutrition, multiple trauma, nutritional support, perioperative period",
author = "McElroy, {Lisa M.} and Codner, {Panna A.} and Karen Brasel",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0884533612464656",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "777--780",
journal = "Nutrition in Clinical Practice",
issn = "0884-5336",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pilot study to explore the safety of perioperative postpyloric enteral nutrition

AU - McElroy, Lisa M.

AU - Codner, Panna A.

AU - Brasel, Karen

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Background: The practice of holding enteral nutrition (EN) 8 hours prior to surgery is common. We hypothesized that it was safe to continue postpyloric EN, and we developed an institutional practice pattern to investigate our hypothesis. Methods: Our pilot study included intubated patients in the surgical intensive care unit at Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital who received EN via a nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube and underwent 1 or more surgical procedures. Demographic, illness, and injury information were collected as well as length of time to NJ placement, time to initiation of EN, EN interruptions, and complications. Additional hours of EN were calculated by totaling the number of hours a patient received EN past midnight on the day of surgery. Results: A total of 14 patients with mean (SD) age 44.3 (19.9) were included. Patients had a mean (SD) Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 26.1 (9.2) on admission and underwent a total of 38 operations following placement of a feeding tube. The most frequent operation performed was an orthopedic procedure (n = 17; 46.1%). The mean (SD) length of EN interruptions for a single procedure was 222.4 (206.9) minutes. Patients received an additional 11.9 (4.7) hours of EN over the course of their hospitalization and an additional 1064.9 (490) kcal/d per operation. There were no adverse events. Conclusion: Perioperative continuation of postpyloric EN is feasible in some critically ill surgical patients and can result in additional calories provided. A multidisciplinary approach and an institutional policy can increase the likelihood of meeting nutrition goals in these patients.

AB - Background: The practice of holding enteral nutrition (EN) 8 hours prior to surgery is common. We hypothesized that it was safe to continue postpyloric EN, and we developed an institutional practice pattern to investigate our hypothesis. Methods: Our pilot study included intubated patients in the surgical intensive care unit at Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital who received EN via a nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube and underwent 1 or more surgical procedures. Demographic, illness, and injury information were collected as well as length of time to NJ placement, time to initiation of EN, EN interruptions, and complications. Additional hours of EN were calculated by totaling the number of hours a patient received EN past midnight on the day of surgery. Results: A total of 14 patients with mean (SD) age 44.3 (19.9) were included. Patients had a mean (SD) Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 26.1 (9.2) on admission and underwent a total of 38 operations following placement of a feeding tube. The most frequent operation performed was an orthopedic procedure (n = 17; 46.1%). The mean (SD) length of EN interruptions for a single procedure was 222.4 (206.9) minutes. Patients received an additional 11.9 (4.7) hours of EN over the course of their hospitalization and an additional 1064.9 (490) kcal/d per operation. There were no adverse events. Conclusion: Perioperative continuation of postpyloric EN is feasible in some critically ill surgical patients and can result in additional calories provided. A multidisciplinary approach and an institutional policy can increase the likelihood of meeting nutrition goals in these patients.

KW - critical illness

KW - enteral nutrition

KW - multiple trauma

KW - nutritional support

KW - perioperative period

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868678086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868678086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0884533612464656

DO - 10.1177/0884533612464656

M3 - Article

C2 - 23093493

AN - SCOPUS:84868678086

VL - 27

SP - 777

EP - 780

JO - Nutrition in Clinical Practice

JF - Nutrition in Clinical Practice

SN - 0884-5336

IS - 6

ER -