A Novel Approach to Measuring Efficiency of Scientific Research Projects: Data Envelopment Analysis

David Dilts, Adrienne Zell, Eric Orwoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Measuring the efficiency of resource allocation for the conduct of scientific projects in medical research is difficult due to, among other factors, the heterogeneity of resources supplied (e.g., dollars or FTEs) and outcomes expected (e.g., grants, publications). While this is an issue in medical science, it has been approached successfully in other fields by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA has a number of advantages over other techniques as it simultaneously uses multiple heterogeneous inputs and outputs to determine which projects are performing most efficiently, referred to as being at the efficiency frontier, when compared to others in the data set. Method: This research uses DEA for the evaluation of supported translational science projects by the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (OCTRI), a NCATS Clinical & Translational Science Award (CTSA) recipient. Results: These results suggest that the primary determinate of overall project efficiency at OCTRI is the amount of funding, with smaller amounts of funding providing more efficiency than larger funding amounts. Conclusion: These results, and the use of DEA, highlight both the success of using this technique in helping determine medical research efficiency and those factors to consider when distributing funds for new projects at CTSAs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-501
Number of pages7
JournalClinical and Translational Science
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Data envelopment analysis
Translational Medical Research
Research
Biomedical Research
Resource Allocation
Organized Financing
Financial Management
Publications
Resource allocation

Keywords

  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Methodology
  • Statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

A Novel Approach to Measuring Efficiency of Scientific Research Projects : Data Envelopment Analysis. / Dilts, David; Zell, Adrienne; Orwoll, Eric.

In: Clinical and Translational Science, Vol. 8, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 495-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2b96edf9dbf421a8fd4f09ca9bf2ffe,
title = "A Novel Approach to Measuring Efficiency of Scientific Research Projects: Data Envelopment Analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: Measuring the efficiency of resource allocation for the conduct of scientific projects in medical research is difficult due to, among other factors, the heterogeneity of resources supplied (e.g., dollars or FTEs) and outcomes expected (e.g., grants, publications). While this is an issue in medical science, it has been approached successfully in other fields by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA has a number of advantages over other techniques as it simultaneously uses multiple heterogeneous inputs and outputs to determine which projects are performing most efficiently, referred to as being at the efficiency frontier, when compared to others in the data set. Method: This research uses DEA for the evaluation of supported translational science projects by the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (OCTRI), a NCATS Clinical & Translational Science Award (CTSA) recipient. Results: These results suggest that the primary determinate of overall project efficiency at OCTRI is the amount of funding, with smaller amounts of funding providing more efficiency than larger funding amounts. Conclusion: These results, and the use of DEA, highlight both the success of using this technique in helping determine medical research efficiency and those factors to consider when distributing funds for new projects at CTSAs.",
keywords = "Cost-benefit analysis, Methodology, Statistics",
author = "David Dilts and Adrienne Zell and Eric Orwoll",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cts.12303",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "495--501",
journal = "Clinical and Translational Science",
issn = "1752-8054",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Novel Approach to Measuring Efficiency of Scientific Research Projects

T2 - Data Envelopment Analysis

AU - Dilts, David

AU - Zell, Adrienne

AU - Orwoll, Eric

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Purpose: Measuring the efficiency of resource allocation for the conduct of scientific projects in medical research is difficult due to, among other factors, the heterogeneity of resources supplied (e.g., dollars or FTEs) and outcomes expected (e.g., grants, publications). While this is an issue in medical science, it has been approached successfully in other fields by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA has a number of advantages over other techniques as it simultaneously uses multiple heterogeneous inputs and outputs to determine which projects are performing most efficiently, referred to as being at the efficiency frontier, when compared to others in the data set. Method: This research uses DEA for the evaluation of supported translational science projects by the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (OCTRI), a NCATS Clinical & Translational Science Award (CTSA) recipient. Results: These results suggest that the primary determinate of overall project efficiency at OCTRI is the amount of funding, with smaller amounts of funding providing more efficiency than larger funding amounts. Conclusion: These results, and the use of DEA, highlight both the success of using this technique in helping determine medical research efficiency and those factors to consider when distributing funds for new projects at CTSAs.

AB - Purpose: Measuring the efficiency of resource allocation for the conduct of scientific projects in medical research is difficult due to, among other factors, the heterogeneity of resources supplied (e.g., dollars or FTEs) and outcomes expected (e.g., grants, publications). While this is an issue in medical science, it has been approached successfully in other fields by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA has a number of advantages over other techniques as it simultaneously uses multiple heterogeneous inputs and outputs to determine which projects are performing most efficiently, referred to as being at the efficiency frontier, when compared to others in the data set. Method: This research uses DEA for the evaluation of supported translational science projects by the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (OCTRI), a NCATS Clinical & Translational Science Award (CTSA) recipient. Results: These results suggest that the primary determinate of overall project efficiency at OCTRI is the amount of funding, with smaller amounts of funding providing more efficiency than larger funding amounts. Conclusion: These results, and the use of DEA, highlight both the success of using this technique in helping determine medical research efficiency and those factors to consider when distributing funds for new projects at CTSAs.

KW - Cost-benefit analysis

KW - Methodology

KW - Statistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946498457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946498457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cts.12303

DO - 10.1111/cts.12303

M3 - Article

C2 - 26243147

AN - SCOPUS:84946498457

VL - 8

SP - 495

EP - 501

JO - Clinical and Translational Science

JF - Clinical and Translational Science

SN - 1752-8054

IS - 5

ER -