A multidisciplinary initiative to standardize intensive care to acute care transitions

Stephanie Halvorson, Brian Wheeler, Marge Willis, Jennifer Watters, Jamie Eastman, Randy O'Donnell, Matthias Merkel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quality issue: Transfers from intensive care units to acute care units represent a complex care transition for hospitalized patients. Within our institution, variation in transfer practices resulted in unpredictable processes in which patient safety concerns were raised. Initial assessment: Key stakeholders were engaged across the institution. Patient safety ('incident') reports and a staff survey identified safety concerns. Choice of a solution: Using lean methodology, current transfer processes were mapped for the four adult intensive care units and waste was identified. During a summit of key stakeholders an ideal transfer process was conceived and a structured handoff tool (checklist) was developed. A daily management system (DMS) was implemented to monitor adherence. Evaluation: The primary process outcome was adherence to the standardized workflow. Audits at 4, 8, and 12 months after implementation indicated that the checklist was used for 100% of transfers. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of transfers completed within a pre-specified time window of 120 minutes, provider notification of patient arrival on the acute care unit, and staff survey responses assessing adequacy of transfer communication. Lessons learned: Prior work has shown that structuring handoffs can improve patient safety, but the novelty of this project was addressing the transfer process in its entirety, across silos of care. Factors leading to the success of this project were the involvement of key stakeholders across the entire institution early in the project development phase, employment of lean methodology, and implementation of tools to guide workflow adherence and track causes of deviation from the workflow.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)615-625
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Patient Transfer
Workflow
Critical Care
Patient Safety
Checklist
Intensive Care Units
Communication
Safety
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Checklist
  • Lean management
  • Process mapping
  • Quality improvement
  • Safety culture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A multidisciplinary initiative to standardize intensive care to acute care transitions. / Halvorson, Stephanie; Wheeler, Brian; Willis, Marge; Watters, Jennifer; Eastman, Jamie; O'Donnell, Randy; Merkel, Matthias.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2016, p. 615-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25447ba6151e41e68bed5cbdc4ab5a36,
title = "A multidisciplinary initiative to standardize intensive care to acute care transitions",
abstract = "Quality issue: Transfers from intensive care units to acute care units represent a complex care transition for hospitalized patients. Within our institution, variation in transfer practices resulted in unpredictable processes in which patient safety concerns were raised. Initial assessment: Key stakeholders were engaged across the institution. Patient safety ('incident') reports and a staff survey identified safety concerns. Choice of a solution: Using lean methodology, current transfer processes were mapped for the four adult intensive care units and waste was identified. During a summit of key stakeholders an ideal transfer process was conceived and a structured handoff tool (checklist) was developed. A daily management system (DMS) was implemented to monitor adherence. Evaluation: The primary process outcome was adherence to the standardized workflow. Audits at 4, 8, and 12 months after implementation indicated that the checklist was used for 100{\%} of transfers. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of transfers completed within a pre-specified time window of 120 minutes, provider notification of patient arrival on the acute care unit, and staff survey responses assessing adequacy of transfer communication. Lessons learned: Prior work has shown that structuring handoffs can improve patient safety, but the novelty of this project was addressing the transfer process in its entirety, across silos of care. Factors leading to the success of this project were the involvement of key stakeholders across the entire institution early in the project development phase, employment of lean methodology, and implementation of tools to guide workflow adherence and track causes of deviation from the workflow.",
keywords = "Checklist, Lean management, Process mapping, Quality improvement, Safety culture",
author = "Stephanie Halvorson and Brian Wheeler and Marge Willis and Jennifer Watters and Jamie Eastman and Randy O'Donnell and Matthias Merkel",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzw076",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "615--625",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multidisciplinary initiative to standardize intensive care to acute care transitions

AU - Halvorson, Stephanie

AU - Wheeler, Brian

AU - Willis, Marge

AU - Watters, Jennifer

AU - Eastman, Jamie

AU - O'Donnell, Randy

AU - Merkel, Matthias

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Quality issue: Transfers from intensive care units to acute care units represent a complex care transition for hospitalized patients. Within our institution, variation in transfer practices resulted in unpredictable processes in which patient safety concerns were raised. Initial assessment: Key stakeholders were engaged across the institution. Patient safety ('incident') reports and a staff survey identified safety concerns. Choice of a solution: Using lean methodology, current transfer processes were mapped for the four adult intensive care units and waste was identified. During a summit of key stakeholders an ideal transfer process was conceived and a structured handoff tool (checklist) was developed. A daily management system (DMS) was implemented to monitor adherence. Evaluation: The primary process outcome was adherence to the standardized workflow. Audits at 4, 8, and 12 months after implementation indicated that the checklist was used for 100% of transfers. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of transfers completed within a pre-specified time window of 120 minutes, provider notification of patient arrival on the acute care unit, and staff survey responses assessing adequacy of transfer communication. Lessons learned: Prior work has shown that structuring handoffs can improve patient safety, but the novelty of this project was addressing the transfer process in its entirety, across silos of care. Factors leading to the success of this project were the involvement of key stakeholders across the entire institution early in the project development phase, employment of lean methodology, and implementation of tools to guide workflow adherence and track causes of deviation from the workflow.

AB - Quality issue: Transfers from intensive care units to acute care units represent a complex care transition for hospitalized patients. Within our institution, variation in transfer practices resulted in unpredictable processes in which patient safety concerns were raised. Initial assessment: Key stakeholders were engaged across the institution. Patient safety ('incident') reports and a staff survey identified safety concerns. Choice of a solution: Using lean methodology, current transfer processes were mapped for the four adult intensive care units and waste was identified. During a summit of key stakeholders an ideal transfer process was conceived and a structured handoff tool (checklist) was developed. A daily management system (DMS) was implemented to monitor adherence. Evaluation: The primary process outcome was adherence to the standardized workflow. Audits at 4, 8, and 12 months after implementation indicated that the checklist was used for 100% of transfers. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of transfers completed within a pre-specified time window of 120 minutes, provider notification of patient arrival on the acute care unit, and staff survey responses assessing adequacy of transfer communication. Lessons learned: Prior work has shown that structuring handoffs can improve patient safety, but the novelty of this project was addressing the transfer process in its entirety, across silos of care. Factors leading to the success of this project were the involvement of key stakeholders across the entire institution early in the project development phase, employment of lean methodology, and implementation of tools to guide workflow adherence and track causes of deviation from the workflow.

KW - Checklist

KW - Lean management

KW - Process mapping

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Safety culture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014472521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014472521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzw076

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzw076

M3 - Article

C2 - 27535085

AN - SCOPUS:85014472521

VL - 28

SP - 615

EP - 625

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 5

ER -