A multicenter evaluation of the impact of sex on abdominal and fracture pain care

Ammar Siddiqui, Laura Belland, Laura Rivera-Reyes, Daniel Handel, Kabir Yadav, Kennon Heard, Amanda Eisenberg, Ula Hwang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previous studies examining sex-based disparities in emergency department (ED) pain care have been limited to a single pain condition, a single study site, and lack rigorous control for confounders. Objective: A multicenter evaluation of the effect of sex on abdominal pain (AP) and fracture pain (FP) care outcomes. Research Design: A retrospective cohort review of ED visits at 5 US hospitals in January, April, July, and October 2009. Subjects: A total of 6931 patients with a final ED diagnosis of FP (n = 1682) or AP (n = 5249) were included. Measures: The primary predictor was sex. The primary outcome was time to analgesic administration. Secondary outcomes included time to medication order, and the likelihood of receiving an analgesic and change in pain scores 360 minutes after triage: Multivariable models, clustered by study site, were conducted to adjust for race, age, comorbidities, initial pain score, ED crowding, and triage acuity. Results: On adjusted analyses, compared with men, women with AP waited longer for analgesic administration [AP women: 112 (65-187) minutes, men: 96 (52-167) minutes, P <0.001] and ordering [women: 84 (41-160) minutes, men: 71 (32-137) minutes, P <0.001], whereas women with FP did not (Administration: P = 0.360; Order: P = 0.133). Compared with men, women with AP were less likely to receive analgesics in the first 90 minutes (OR = 0.766; 95% CI, 0.670-0.875; P <0.001), whereas women with FP were not (P = 0.357). Discussion: In this multicenter study, we found that women experienced delays in analgesic administration for AP, but not for FP. Future research and interventions to decrease sex disparities in pain care should take type of pain into account.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)948-953
Number of pages6
JournalMedical Care
Volume53
Issue number11
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Abdominal Pain
Pain
Analgesics
Hospital Emergency Service
Triage
Crowding
Multicenter Studies
Comorbidity
Research Design

Keywords

  • Health policy
  • Pain care
  • Sex

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Siddiqui, A., Belland, L., Rivera-Reyes, L., Handel, D., Yadav, K., Heard, K., ... Hwang, U. (2015). A multicenter evaluation of the impact of sex on abdominal and fracture pain care. Medical Care, 53(11), 948-953.

A multicenter evaluation of the impact of sex on abdominal and fracture pain care. / Siddiqui, Ammar; Belland, Laura; Rivera-Reyes, Laura; Handel, Daniel; Yadav, Kabir; Heard, Kennon; Eisenberg, Amanda; Hwang, Ula.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 53, No. 11, 2015, p. 948-953.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siddiqui, A, Belland, L, Rivera-Reyes, L, Handel, D, Yadav, K, Heard, K, Eisenberg, A & Hwang, U 2015, 'A multicenter evaluation of the impact of sex on abdominal and fracture pain care', Medical Care, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 948-953.
Siddiqui A, Belland L, Rivera-Reyes L, Handel D, Yadav K, Heard K et al. A multicenter evaluation of the impact of sex on abdominal and fracture pain care. Medical Care. 2015;53(11):948-953.
Siddiqui, Ammar ; Belland, Laura ; Rivera-Reyes, Laura ; Handel, Daniel ; Yadav, Kabir ; Heard, Kennon ; Eisenberg, Amanda ; Hwang, Ula. / A multicenter evaluation of the impact of sex on abdominal and fracture pain care. In: Medical Care. 2015 ; Vol. 53, No. 11. pp. 948-953.
@article{4e69a3a5b0c54975988c25b77dfc313d,
title = "A multicenter evaluation of the impact of sex on abdominal and fracture pain care",
abstract = "Background: Previous studies examining sex-based disparities in emergency department (ED) pain care have been limited to a single pain condition, a single study site, and lack rigorous control for confounders. Objective: A multicenter evaluation of the effect of sex on abdominal pain (AP) and fracture pain (FP) care outcomes. Research Design: A retrospective cohort review of ED visits at 5 US hospitals in January, April, July, and October 2009. Subjects: A total of 6931 patients with a final ED diagnosis of FP (n = 1682) or AP (n = 5249) were included. Measures: The primary predictor was sex. The primary outcome was time to analgesic administration. Secondary outcomes included time to medication order, and the likelihood of receiving an analgesic and change in pain scores 360 minutes after triage: Multivariable models, clustered by study site, were conducted to adjust for race, age, comorbidities, initial pain score, ED crowding, and triage acuity. Results: On adjusted analyses, compared with men, women with AP waited longer for analgesic administration [AP women: 112 (65-187) minutes, men: 96 (52-167) minutes, P <0.001] and ordering [women: 84 (41-160) minutes, men: 71 (32-137) minutes, P <0.001], whereas women with FP did not (Administration: P = 0.360; Order: P = 0.133). Compared with men, women with AP were less likely to receive analgesics in the first 90 minutes (OR = 0.766; 95{\%} CI, 0.670-0.875; P <0.001), whereas women with FP were not (P = 0.357). Discussion: In this multicenter study, we found that women experienced delays in analgesic administration for AP, but not for FP. Future research and interventions to decrease sex disparities in pain care should take type of pain into account.",
keywords = "Health policy, Pain care, Sex",
author = "Ammar Siddiqui and Laura Belland and Laura Rivera-Reyes and Daniel Handel and Kabir Yadav and Kennon Heard and Amanda Eisenberg and Ula Hwang",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "948--953",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multicenter evaluation of the impact of sex on abdominal and fracture pain care

AU - Siddiqui, Ammar

AU - Belland, Laura

AU - Rivera-Reyes, Laura

AU - Handel, Daniel

AU - Yadav, Kabir

AU - Heard, Kennon

AU - Eisenberg, Amanda

AU - Hwang, Ula

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: Previous studies examining sex-based disparities in emergency department (ED) pain care have been limited to a single pain condition, a single study site, and lack rigorous control for confounders. Objective: A multicenter evaluation of the effect of sex on abdominal pain (AP) and fracture pain (FP) care outcomes. Research Design: A retrospective cohort review of ED visits at 5 US hospitals in January, April, July, and October 2009. Subjects: A total of 6931 patients with a final ED diagnosis of FP (n = 1682) or AP (n = 5249) were included. Measures: The primary predictor was sex. The primary outcome was time to analgesic administration. Secondary outcomes included time to medication order, and the likelihood of receiving an analgesic and change in pain scores 360 minutes after triage: Multivariable models, clustered by study site, were conducted to adjust for race, age, comorbidities, initial pain score, ED crowding, and triage acuity. Results: On adjusted analyses, compared with men, women with AP waited longer for analgesic administration [AP women: 112 (65-187) minutes, men: 96 (52-167) minutes, P <0.001] and ordering [women: 84 (41-160) minutes, men: 71 (32-137) minutes, P <0.001], whereas women with FP did not (Administration: P = 0.360; Order: P = 0.133). Compared with men, women with AP were less likely to receive analgesics in the first 90 minutes (OR = 0.766; 95% CI, 0.670-0.875; P <0.001), whereas women with FP were not (P = 0.357). Discussion: In this multicenter study, we found that women experienced delays in analgesic administration for AP, but not for FP. Future research and interventions to decrease sex disparities in pain care should take type of pain into account.

AB - Background: Previous studies examining sex-based disparities in emergency department (ED) pain care have been limited to a single pain condition, a single study site, and lack rigorous control for confounders. Objective: A multicenter evaluation of the effect of sex on abdominal pain (AP) and fracture pain (FP) care outcomes. Research Design: A retrospective cohort review of ED visits at 5 US hospitals in January, April, July, and October 2009. Subjects: A total of 6931 patients with a final ED diagnosis of FP (n = 1682) or AP (n = 5249) were included. Measures: The primary predictor was sex. The primary outcome was time to analgesic administration. Secondary outcomes included time to medication order, and the likelihood of receiving an analgesic and change in pain scores 360 minutes after triage: Multivariable models, clustered by study site, were conducted to adjust for race, age, comorbidities, initial pain score, ED crowding, and triage acuity. Results: On adjusted analyses, compared with men, women with AP waited longer for analgesic administration [AP women: 112 (65-187) minutes, men: 96 (52-167) minutes, P <0.001] and ordering [women: 84 (41-160) minutes, men: 71 (32-137) minutes, P <0.001], whereas women with FP did not (Administration: P = 0.360; Order: P = 0.133). Compared with men, women with AP were less likely to receive analgesics in the first 90 minutes (OR = 0.766; 95% CI, 0.670-0.875; P <0.001), whereas women with FP were not (P = 0.357). Discussion: In this multicenter study, we found that women experienced delays in analgesic administration for AP, but not for FP. Future research and interventions to decrease sex disparities in pain care should take type of pain into account.

KW - Health policy

KW - Pain care

KW - Sex

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944320930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944320930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 948

EP - 953

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 11

ER -