A model treatment refusal procedure for defendants found incompetent to stand trial in the Ninth Circuit

Martin Epson, Liban Rodol, Joseph Bloom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pretrial detainees have a constitutionally protected right to refuse medical treatment in most circumstances; however, individuals found incompetent to stand trial (IST) due to a mental disorder can be treated involuntarily by clinicians who adhere to careful medical and legal procedures. The process of involuntary treatment of IST pretrial detainees begins with categorization into particular legal and medical groups. These different categories affect the individual's access to treatment. In this article, we review the relevant case law for the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit and place the medical-legal debate regarding these procedures in the context of recent cases. To address the medical-legal disjunction, we propose and discuss a model for managing treatment refusal in pretrial detainees found IST.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-421
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume40
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Treatment Refusal
Mental Disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A model treatment refusal procedure for defendants found incompetent to stand trial in the Ninth Circuit. / Epson, Martin; Rodol, Liban; Bloom, Joseph.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.09.2012, p. 417-421.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f70dcff57ec84a5caf01c68170aac880,
title = "A model treatment refusal procedure for defendants found incompetent to stand trial in the Ninth Circuit",
abstract = "Pretrial detainees have a constitutionally protected right to refuse medical treatment in most circumstances; however, individuals found incompetent to stand trial (IST) due to a mental disorder can be treated involuntarily by clinicians who adhere to careful medical and legal procedures. The process of involuntary treatment of IST pretrial detainees begins with categorization into particular legal and medical groups. These different categories affect the individual's access to treatment. In this article, we review the relevant case law for the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit and place the medical-legal debate regarding these procedures in the context of recent cases. To address the medical-legal disjunction, we propose and discuss a model for managing treatment refusal in pretrial detainees found IST.",
author = "Martin Epson and Liban Rodol and Joseph Bloom",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "417--421",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A model treatment refusal procedure for defendants found incompetent to stand trial in the Ninth Circuit

AU - Epson, Martin

AU - Rodol, Liban

AU - Bloom, Joseph

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Pretrial detainees have a constitutionally protected right to refuse medical treatment in most circumstances; however, individuals found incompetent to stand trial (IST) due to a mental disorder can be treated involuntarily by clinicians who adhere to careful medical and legal procedures. The process of involuntary treatment of IST pretrial detainees begins with categorization into particular legal and medical groups. These different categories affect the individual's access to treatment. In this article, we review the relevant case law for the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit and place the medical-legal debate regarding these procedures in the context of recent cases. To address the medical-legal disjunction, we propose and discuss a model for managing treatment refusal in pretrial detainees found IST.

AB - Pretrial detainees have a constitutionally protected right to refuse medical treatment in most circumstances; however, individuals found incompetent to stand trial (IST) due to a mental disorder can be treated involuntarily by clinicians who adhere to careful medical and legal procedures. The process of involuntary treatment of IST pretrial detainees begins with categorization into particular legal and medical groups. These different categories affect the individual's access to treatment. In this article, we review the relevant case law for the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit and place the medical-legal debate regarding these procedures in the context of recent cases. To address the medical-legal disjunction, we propose and discuss a model for managing treatment refusal in pretrial detainees found IST.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866315205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866315205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22960925

AN - SCOPUS:84866315205

VL - 40

SP - 417

EP - 421

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 3

ER -