A mixed methods study of patient-provider communication about opioid analgesics

Helen Kinsman Hughes, Philip (Todd) Korthuis, Somnath (Som) Saha, Susan Eggly, Victoria Sharp, Jonathan Cohn, Richard Moore, Mary Catherine Beach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe patient-provider communication about opioid pain medicine and explore how these discussions affect provider attitudes toward patients. Methods: We audio-recorded 45 HIV providers and 423 patients in routine outpatient encounters at four sites across the country. Providers completed post-visit questionnaires assessing their attitudes toward patients. We identified discussions about opioid pain management and analyzed them qualitatively. We used logistic regression to assess the association between opioid discussion and providers' attitudes toward patients. Results: 48 encounters (11% of the total sample) contained substantive discussion of opioid-related pain management. Most conversations were initiated by patients (n = 28, 58%) and ended by the providers (n = 36, 75%). Twelve encounters (25%) contained dialog suggesting a difference of opinion or conflict. Providers more often agreed than disagreed to give the prescription (50% vs. 23%), sometimes reluctantly; in 27% (n = 13) of encounters, no decision was made. Fewer than half of providers (n = 20, 42%) acknowledged the patient's experience of pain. Providers had a lower odds of positive regard for the patient (adjusted OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.95) when opioids were discussed. Conclusions: Pain management discussions are common in routine outpatient HIV encounters and providers may regard patients less favorably if opioids are discussed during visits. The sometimes-adversarial nature of these discussions may negatively affect provider attitudes toward patients. Practice implications: Empathy and pain acknowledgment are tools that clinicians can use to facilitate productive discussions of pain management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)453-461
Number of pages9
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume98
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Opioid Analgesics
Communication
Pain Management
Pain
Outpatients
HIV
Prescriptions
Logistic Models
Medicine

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Mixed methods
  • Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A mixed methods study of patient-provider communication about opioid analgesics. / Hughes, Helen Kinsman; Korthuis, Philip (Todd); Saha, Somnath (Som); Eggly, Susan; Sharp, Victoria; Cohn, Jonathan; Moore, Richard; Beach, Mary Catherine.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 98, No. 4, 2015, p. 453-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hughes, Helen Kinsman ; Korthuis, Philip (Todd) ; Saha, Somnath (Som) ; Eggly, Susan ; Sharp, Victoria ; Cohn, Jonathan ; Moore, Richard ; Beach, Mary Catherine. / A mixed methods study of patient-provider communication about opioid analgesics. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2015 ; Vol. 98, No. 4. pp. 453-461.
@article{983c5db96d6942db9b7f479ad1306670,
title = "A mixed methods study of patient-provider communication about opioid analgesics",
abstract = "Objective: To describe patient-provider communication about opioid pain medicine and explore how these discussions affect provider attitudes toward patients. Methods: We audio-recorded 45 HIV providers and 423 patients in routine outpatient encounters at four sites across the country. Providers completed post-visit questionnaires assessing their attitudes toward patients. We identified discussions about opioid pain management and analyzed them qualitatively. We used logistic regression to assess the association between opioid discussion and providers' attitudes toward patients. Results: 48 encounters (11{\%} of the total sample) contained substantive discussion of opioid-related pain management. Most conversations were initiated by patients (n = 28, 58{\%}) and ended by the providers (n = 36, 75{\%}). Twelve encounters (25{\%}) contained dialog suggesting a difference of opinion or conflict. Providers more often agreed than disagreed to give the prescription (50{\%} vs. 23{\%}), sometimes reluctantly; in 27{\%} (n = 13) of encounters, no decision was made. Fewer than half of providers (n = 20, 42{\%}) acknowledged the patient's experience of pain. Providers had a lower odds of positive regard for the patient (adjusted OR = 0.51, 95{\%} CI: 0.27-0.95) when opioids were discussed. Conclusions: Pain management discussions are common in routine outpatient HIV encounters and providers may regard patients less favorably if opioids are discussed during visits. The sometimes-adversarial nature of these discussions may negatively affect provider attitudes toward patients. Practice implications: Empathy and pain acknowledgment are tools that clinicians can use to facilitate productive discussions of pain management.",
keywords = "Communication, Mixed methods, Pain",
author = "Hughes, {Helen Kinsman} and Korthuis, {Philip (Todd)} and Saha, {Somnath (Som)} and Susan Eggly and Victoria Sharp and Jonathan Cohn and Richard Moore and Beach, {Mary Catherine}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "453--461",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A mixed methods study of patient-provider communication about opioid analgesics

AU - Hughes, Helen Kinsman

AU - Korthuis, Philip (Todd)

AU - Saha, Somnath (Som)

AU - Eggly, Susan

AU - Sharp, Victoria

AU - Cohn, Jonathan

AU - Moore, Richard

AU - Beach, Mary Catherine

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objective: To describe patient-provider communication about opioid pain medicine and explore how these discussions affect provider attitudes toward patients. Methods: We audio-recorded 45 HIV providers and 423 patients in routine outpatient encounters at four sites across the country. Providers completed post-visit questionnaires assessing their attitudes toward patients. We identified discussions about opioid pain management and analyzed them qualitatively. We used logistic regression to assess the association between opioid discussion and providers' attitudes toward patients. Results: 48 encounters (11% of the total sample) contained substantive discussion of opioid-related pain management. Most conversations were initiated by patients (n = 28, 58%) and ended by the providers (n = 36, 75%). Twelve encounters (25%) contained dialog suggesting a difference of opinion or conflict. Providers more often agreed than disagreed to give the prescription (50% vs. 23%), sometimes reluctantly; in 27% (n = 13) of encounters, no decision was made. Fewer than half of providers (n = 20, 42%) acknowledged the patient's experience of pain. Providers had a lower odds of positive regard for the patient (adjusted OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.95) when opioids were discussed. Conclusions: Pain management discussions are common in routine outpatient HIV encounters and providers may regard patients less favorably if opioids are discussed during visits. The sometimes-adversarial nature of these discussions may negatively affect provider attitudes toward patients. Practice implications: Empathy and pain acknowledgment are tools that clinicians can use to facilitate productive discussions of pain management.

AB - Objective: To describe patient-provider communication about opioid pain medicine and explore how these discussions affect provider attitudes toward patients. Methods: We audio-recorded 45 HIV providers and 423 patients in routine outpatient encounters at four sites across the country. Providers completed post-visit questionnaires assessing their attitudes toward patients. We identified discussions about opioid pain management and analyzed them qualitatively. We used logistic regression to assess the association between opioid discussion and providers' attitudes toward patients. Results: 48 encounters (11% of the total sample) contained substantive discussion of opioid-related pain management. Most conversations were initiated by patients (n = 28, 58%) and ended by the providers (n = 36, 75%). Twelve encounters (25%) contained dialog suggesting a difference of opinion or conflict. Providers more often agreed than disagreed to give the prescription (50% vs. 23%), sometimes reluctantly; in 27% (n = 13) of encounters, no decision was made. Fewer than half of providers (n = 20, 42%) acknowledged the patient's experience of pain. Providers had a lower odds of positive regard for the patient (adjusted OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.95) when opioids were discussed. Conclusions: Pain management discussions are common in routine outpatient HIV encounters and providers may regard patients less favorably if opioids are discussed during visits. The sometimes-adversarial nature of these discussions may negatively affect provider attitudes toward patients. Practice implications: Empathy and pain acknowledgment are tools that clinicians can use to facilitate productive discussions of pain management.

KW - Communication

KW - Mixed methods

KW - Pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933277513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933277513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 25601279

AN - SCOPUS:84933277513

VL - 98

SP - 453

EP - 461

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 4

ER -