A descriptive analysis of emergency medical service systems participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) network

Daniel P. Davis, Lisa A. Garberson, Douglas L. Andrusiek, David Hostler, Mohamud Ramzan Daya, Ronald Pirrallo, Alan Craig, Shannon Stephens, Jonathan Larsen, Alexander F. Drum, Raymond Fowler, Myron Weisfeldt, Joseph P. Ornato, David B. Hoyt, John B. Holcomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

114 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The optimal Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system characteristics have not been defined, resulting in substantial variability across systems. The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) is a United States-Canada research network that organized EMS agencies from 11 different systems to perform controlled trials in cardiac arrest and life-threatening trauma resuscitation. Objectives. To describe EMS systems participating in ROC using a novel framework. Methods. Standardized surveys were created by ROC investigators and distributed to each site for completion. These included separate questions for individual hospitals, EMS agencies, and dispatch centers. Results were collated and analyzed by using descriptive statistics. Results. A total of 264 EMS agencies, 287 hospitals, and 154 dispatch centers were included. Agencies were described with respect to the type (fire-based, non-fire governmental, private), transport status (transport/non-transport), and training level (BLS/ALS). Hospitals were described with regard to their trauma designation and the presence of electrophysiology and cardiac catheterization laboratories. Dispatch center characteristics, including primary versus secondary public safety answering point (PSAP) status and the use of prearrival instructions, were also described. Differences in EMS system characteristics between ROC sites were observed with multiple intriguing patterns. Rural areas and fire-based agencies had more EMS units and providers per capita. This may reflect longer response and transport distances in rural areas and the additional duties of most fire-based providers. In addition, hospitals in the United States typically had catheterization laboratories, whereas Canadian hospitals generally did not. The vast majority of both primary and secondary PSAPs use computer-aided dispatch. Conclusions. Similarities and differences among EMS systems participating in the ROC network were described. The framework used in this analysis may serve as a template for future EMS research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-382
Number of pages14
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Resuscitation
Electrophysiology
Wounds and Injuries
Cardiac Catheterization
Heart Arrest
Catheterization
Canada
Biomedical Research
Hospital Emergency Service
Research Personnel
Safety
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

A descriptive analysis of emergency medical service systems participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) network. / Davis, Daniel P.; Garberson, Lisa A.; Andrusiek, Douglas L.; Hostler, David; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan; Pirrallo, Ronald; Craig, Alan; Stephens, Shannon; Larsen, Jonathan; Drum, Alexander F.; Fowler, Raymond; Weisfeldt, Myron; Ornato, Joseph P.; Hoyt, David B.; Holcomb, John B.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 11, No. 4, 10.2007, p. 369-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, DP, Garberson, LA, Andrusiek, DL, Hostler, D, Daya, MR, Pirrallo, R, Craig, A, Stephens, S, Larsen, J, Drum, AF, Fowler, R, Weisfeldt, M, Ornato, JP, Hoyt, DB & Holcomb, JB 2007, 'A descriptive analysis of emergency medical service systems participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) network', Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903120701537147
Davis, Daniel P. ; Garberson, Lisa A. ; Andrusiek, Douglas L. ; Hostler, David ; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan ; Pirrallo, Ronald ; Craig, Alan ; Stephens, Shannon ; Larsen, Jonathan ; Drum, Alexander F. ; Fowler, Raymond ; Weisfeldt, Myron ; Ornato, Joseph P. ; Hoyt, David B. ; Holcomb, John B. / A descriptive analysis of emergency medical service systems participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) network. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2007 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 369-382.
@article{5c2449f0729d4180b3fe77dd7f835361,
title = "A descriptive analysis of emergency medical service systems participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) network",
abstract = "Background. The optimal Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system characteristics have not been defined, resulting in substantial variability across systems. The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) is a United States-Canada research network that organized EMS agencies from 11 different systems to perform controlled trials in cardiac arrest and life-threatening trauma resuscitation. Objectives. To describe EMS systems participating in ROC using a novel framework. Methods. Standardized surveys were created by ROC investigators and distributed to each site for completion. These included separate questions for individual hospitals, EMS agencies, and dispatch centers. Results were collated and analyzed by using descriptive statistics. Results. A total of 264 EMS agencies, 287 hospitals, and 154 dispatch centers were included. Agencies were described with respect to the type (fire-based, non-fire governmental, private), transport status (transport/non-transport), and training level (BLS/ALS). Hospitals were described with regard to their trauma designation and the presence of electrophysiology and cardiac catheterization laboratories. Dispatch center characteristics, including primary versus secondary public safety answering point (PSAP) status and the use of prearrival instructions, were also described. Differences in EMS system characteristics between ROC sites were observed with multiple intriguing patterns. Rural areas and fire-based agencies had more EMS units and providers per capita. This may reflect longer response and transport distances in rural areas and the additional duties of most fire-based providers. In addition, hospitals in the United States typically had catheterization laboratories, whereas Canadian hospitals generally did not. The vast majority of both primary and secondary PSAPs use computer-aided dispatch. Conclusions. Similarities and differences among EMS systems participating in the ROC network were described. The framework used in this analysis may serve as a template for future EMS research.",
author = "Davis, {Daniel P.} and Garberson, {Lisa A.} and Andrusiek, {Douglas L.} and David Hostler and Daya, {Mohamud Ramzan} and Ronald Pirrallo and Alan Craig and Shannon Stephens and Jonathan Larsen and Drum, {Alexander F.} and Raymond Fowler and Myron Weisfeldt and Ornato, {Joseph P.} and Hoyt, {David B.} and Holcomb, {John B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/10903120701537147",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "369--382",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A descriptive analysis of emergency medical service systems participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) network

AU - Davis, Daniel P.

AU - Garberson, Lisa A.

AU - Andrusiek, Douglas L.

AU - Hostler, David

AU - Daya, Mohamud Ramzan

AU - Pirrallo, Ronald

AU - Craig, Alan

AU - Stephens, Shannon

AU - Larsen, Jonathan

AU - Drum, Alexander F.

AU - Fowler, Raymond

AU - Weisfeldt, Myron

AU - Ornato, Joseph P.

AU - Hoyt, David B.

AU - Holcomb, John B.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Background. The optimal Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system characteristics have not been defined, resulting in substantial variability across systems. The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) is a United States-Canada research network that organized EMS agencies from 11 different systems to perform controlled trials in cardiac arrest and life-threatening trauma resuscitation. Objectives. To describe EMS systems participating in ROC using a novel framework. Methods. Standardized surveys were created by ROC investigators and distributed to each site for completion. These included separate questions for individual hospitals, EMS agencies, and dispatch centers. Results were collated and analyzed by using descriptive statistics. Results. A total of 264 EMS agencies, 287 hospitals, and 154 dispatch centers were included. Agencies were described with respect to the type (fire-based, non-fire governmental, private), transport status (transport/non-transport), and training level (BLS/ALS). Hospitals were described with regard to their trauma designation and the presence of electrophysiology and cardiac catheterization laboratories. Dispatch center characteristics, including primary versus secondary public safety answering point (PSAP) status and the use of prearrival instructions, were also described. Differences in EMS system characteristics between ROC sites were observed with multiple intriguing patterns. Rural areas and fire-based agencies had more EMS units and providers per capita. This may reflect longer response and transport distances in rural areas and the additional duties of most fire-based providers. In addition, hospitals in the United States typically had catheterization laboratories, whereas Canadian hospitals generally did not. The vast majority of both primary and secondary PSAPs use computer-aided dispatch. Conclusions. Similarities and differences among EMS systems participating in the ROC network were described. The framework used in this analysis may serve as a template for future EMS research.

AB - Background. The optimal Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system characteristics have not been defined, resulting in substantial variability across systems. The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) is a United States-Canada research network that organized EMS agencies from 11 different systems to perform controlled trials in cardiac arrest and life-threatening trauma resuscitation. Objectives. To describe EMS systems participating in ROC using a novel framework. Methods. Standardized surveys were created by ROC investigators and distributed to each site for completion. These included separate questions for individual hospitals, EMS agencies, and dispatch centers. Results were collated and analyzed by using descriptive statistics. Results. A total of 264 EMS agencies, 287 hospitals, and 154 dispatch centers were included. Agencies were described with respect to the type (fire-based, non-fire governmental, private), transport status (transport/non-transport), and training level (BLS/ALS). Hospitals were described with regard to their trauma designation and the presence of electrophysiology and cardiac catheterization laboratories. Dispatch center characteristics, including primary versus secondary public safety answering point (PSAP) status and the use of prearrival instructions, were also described. Differences in EMS system characteristics between ROC sites were observed with multiple intriguing patterns. Rural areas and fire-based agencies had more EMS units and providers per capita. This may reflect longer response and transport distances in rural areas and the additional duties of most fire-based providers. In addition, hospitals in the United States typically had catheterization laboratories, whereas Canadian hospitals generally did not. The vast majority of both primary and secondary PSAPs use computer-aided dispatch. Conclusions. Similarities and differences among EMS systems participating in the ROC network were described. The framework used in this analysis may serve as a template for future EMS research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848901924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848901924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903120701537147

DO - 10.1080/10903120701537147

M3 - Article

C2 - 17907019

AN - SCOPUS:34848901924

VL - 11

SP - 369

EP - 382

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 4

ER -