A cost and outcome analysis of pediatric single-incision appendectomy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background For appendicitis, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIA) has been proposed as an alternative to 3-port appendectomy (3PA). However, there remains controversy regarding outcomes and cost of SIA. We sought to review our experience with these two techniques to identify differences in these factors. Materials and methods The charts of children (0-17 y) who underwent appendectomy at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2011-2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Appendectomy was either performed through traditional 3PA or SIA (laparoscopically assisted via externalization through an umbilical incision). Demographic data including age, body mass index, comorbidities, and gender were examined. Information on perforation, operative time and cost, length of stay, and infectious complications for both SIA and 3PA was identified. Data were analyzed using student t tests and chi square analysis. Results A total of 337 patients underwent appendectomy (141 SIA and 197 3PA), 35.6% of whom (40 SIA, 80 3PA) had perforated appendicitis. For nonperforated appendicitis, SIA had significantly shorter operative times, decreased operative costs, and length of stay. However, these differences were not found for perforated appendicitis. Regardless of appendicitis severity, there was no difference in rates of wound infection, abscess, or readmission between the two techniques. Conclusions Our study suggests that SIA is a faster, more cost effective alternative than 3PA for acute appendicitis. SIA did not result in increased infection rates for acute or perforated appendicitis and can be considered an equivalent alternative to 3PA in the surgical management of appendicitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-257
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume203
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2016

Fingerprint

Appendectomy
Pediatrics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Appendicitis
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Umbilicus
Pediatric Hospitals

Keywords

  • Appendicitis
  • Cost analysis
  • Single port
  • Three-port appendectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A cost and outcome analysis of pediatric single-incision appendectomy. / Wieck, Minna M.; Hamilton, Nicholas; Krishnaswami, Sanjay.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 203, No. 2, 15.06.2016, p. 253-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{16d188386e83495bad12910f426bd9cb,
title = "A cost and outcome analysis of pediatric single-incision appendectomy",
abstract = "Background For appendicitis, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIA) has been proposed as an alternative to 3-port appendectomy (3PA). However, there remains controversy regarding outcomes and cost of SIA. We sought to review our experience with these two techniques to identify differences in these factors. Materials and methods The charts of children (0-17 y) who underwent appendectomy at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2011-2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Appendectomy was either performed through traditional 3PA or SIA (laparoscopically assisted via externalization through an umbilical incision). Demographic data including age, body mass index, comorbidities, and gender were examined. Information on perforation, operative time and cost, length of stay, and infectious complications for both SIA and 3PA was identified. Data were analyzed using student t tests and chi square analysis. Results A total of 337 patients underwent appendectomy (141 SIA and 197 3PA), 35.6{\%} of whom (40 SIA, 80 3PA) had perforated appendicitis. For nonperforated appendicitis, SIA had significantly shorter operative times, decreased operative costs, and length of stay. However, these differences were not found for perforated appendicitis. Regardless of appendicitis severity, there was no difference in rates of wound infection, abscess, or readmission between the two techniques. Conclusions Our study suggests that SIA is a faster, more cost effective alternative than 3PA for acute appendicitis. SIA did not result in increased infection rates for acute or perforated appendicitis and can be considered an equivalent alternative to 3PA in the surgical management of appendicitis.",
keywords = "Appendicitis, Cost analysis, Single port, Three-port appendectomy",
author = "Wieck, {Minna M.} and Nicholas Hamilton and Sanjay Krishnaswami",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "203",
pages = "253--257",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cost and outcome analysis of pediatric single-incision appendectomy

AU - Wieck, Minna M.

AU - Hamilton, Nicholas

AU - Krishnaswami, Sanjay

PY - 2016/6/15

Y1 - 2016/6/15

N2 - Background For appendicitis, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIA) has been proposed as an alternative to 3-port appendectomy (3PA). However, there remains controversy regarding outcomes and cost of SIA. We sought to review our experience with these two techniques to identify differences in these factors. Materials and methods The charts of children (0-17 y) who underwent appendectomy at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2011-2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Appendectomy was either performed through traditional 3PA or SIA (laparoscopically assisted via externalization through an umbilical incision). Demographic data including age, body mass index, comorbidities, and gender were examined. Information on perforation, operative time and cost, length of stay, and infectious complications for both SIA and 3PA was identified. Data were analyzed using student t tests and chi square analysis. Results A total of 337 patients underwent appendectomy (141 SIA and 197 3PA), 35.6% of whom (40 SIA, 80 3PA) had perforated appendicitis. For nonperforated appendicitis, SIA had significantly shorter operative times, decreased operative costs, and length of stay. However, these differences were not found for perforated appendicitis. Regardless of appendicitis severity, there was no difference in rates of wound infection, abscess, or readmission between the two techniques. Conclusions Our study suggests that SIA is a faster, more cost effective alternative than 3PA for acute appendicitis. SIA did not result in increased infection rates for acute or perforated appendicitis and can be considered an equivalent alternative to 3PA in the surgical management of appendicitis.

AB - Background For appendicitis, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIA) has been proposed as an alternative to 3-port appendectomy (3PA). However, there remains controversy regarding outcomes and cost of SIA. We sought to review our experience with these two techniques to identify differences in these factors. Materials and methods The charts of children (0-17 y) who underwent appendectomy at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2011-2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Appendectomy was either performed through traditional 3PA or SIA (laparoscopically assisted via externalization through an umbilical incision). Demographic data including age, body mass index, comorbidities, and gender were examined. Information on perforation, operative time and cost, length of stay, and infectious complications for both SIA and 3PA was identified. Data were analyzed using student t tests and chi square analysis. Results A total of 337 patients underwent appendectomy (141 SIA and 197 3PA), 35.6% of whom (40 SIA, 80 3PA) had perforated appendicitis. For nonperforated appendicitis, SIA had significantly shorter operative times, decreased operative costs, and length of stay. However, these differences were not found for perforated appendicitis. Regardless of appendicitis severity, there was no difference in rates of wound infection, abscess, or readmission between the two techniques. Conclusions Our study suggests that SIA is a faster, more cost effective alternative than 3PA for acute appendicitis. SIA did not result in increased infection rates for acute or perforated appendicitis and can be considered an equivalent alternative to 3PA in the surgical management of appendicitis.

KW - Appendicitis

KW - Cost analysis

KW - Single port

KW - Three-port appendectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969668354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969668354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.033

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.033

M3 - Article

VL - 203

SP - 253

EP - 257

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 2

ER -