A comprehensive comparison of normalization methods for loading control and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array data

Wenbin Liu, Zhenlin Ju, Yiling Lu, Gordon Mills, Rehan Akbani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Loading control (LC) and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) data have been challenging mainly due to the small number of proteins in an experiment and the lack of reliable inherent control markers. In this study, we compare eight diferent normalization methods for LC and variance stabilization. Te invariant marker set concept was frst applied to the normalization of high-throughput gene expression data. A set of “invariant” markers are selected to create a virtual reference sample. Ten all the samples are normalized to the virtual reference. We propose a variant of this method in the context of RPPA data normalization and compare it with seven other normalization methods previously reported in the literature. Te invariant marker set method performs well with respect to LC, variance stabilization and association with the immunohistochemistry/forescence in situ hybridization data for three key markers in breast tumor samples, while the other methods have inferior performance. Te proposed method is a promising approach for improving the quality of RPPA data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-117
Number of pages9
JournalCancer Informatics
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 16 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Protein Array Analysis
In Situ Hybridization
Immunohistochemistry
Breast Neoplasms
Gene Expression
Proteins

Keywords

  • Normalization
  • Proteomics
  • Reverse-phase protein array
  • RPPA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

A comprehensive comparison of normalization methods for loading control and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array data. / Liu, Wenbin; Ju, Zhenlin; Lu, Yiling; Mills, Gordon; Akbani, Rehan.

In: Cancer Informatics, Vol. 13, 16.10.2014, p. 109-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3fb41e75326f4e53b5a75f0d6ca5d3a1,
title = "A comprehensive comparison of normalization methods for loading control and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array data",
abstract = "Loading control (LC) and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) data have been challenging mainly due to the small number of proteins in an experiment and the lack of reliable inherent control markers. In this study, we compare eight diferent normalization methods for LC and variance stabilization. Te invariant marker set concept was frst applied to the normalization of high-throughput gene expression data. A set of “invariant” markers are selected to create a virtual reference sample. Ten all the samples are normalized to the virtual reference. We propose a variant of this method in the context of RPPA data normalization and compare it with seven other normalization methods previously reported in the literature. Te invariant marker set method performs well with respect to LC, variance stabilization and association with the immunohistochemistry/forescence in situ hybridization data for three key markers in breast tumor samples, while the other methods have inferior performance. Te proposed method is a promising approach for improving the quality of RPPA data.",
keywords = "Normalization, Proteomics, Reverse-phase protein array, RPPA",
author = "Wenbin Liu and Zhenlin Ju and Yiling Lu and Gordon Mills and Rehan Akbani",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.4137/CIn.s13329",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "109--117",
journal = "Cancer Informatics",
issn = "1176-9351",
publisher = "Libertas Academica Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comprehensive comparison of normalization methods for loading control and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array data

AU - Liu, Wenbin

AU - Ju, Zhenlin

AU - Lu, Yiling

AU - Mills, Gordon

AU - Akbani, Rehan

PY - 2014/10/16

Y1 - 2014/10/16

N2 - Loading control (LC) and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) data have been challenging mainly due to the small number of proteins in an experiment and the lack of reliable inherent control markers. In this study, we compare eight diferent normalization methods for LC and variance stabilization. Te invariant marker set concept was frst applied to the normalization of high-throughput gene expression data. A set of “invariant” markers are selected to create a virtual reference sample. Ten all the samples are normalized to the virtual reference. We propose a variant of this method in the context of RPPA data normalization and compare it with seven other normalization methods previously reported in the literature. Te invariant marker set method performs well with respect to LC, variance stabilization and association with the immunohistochemistry/forescence in situ hybridization data for three key markers in breast tumor samples, while the other methods have inferior performance. Te proposed method is a promising approach for improving the quality of RPPA data.

AB - Loading control (LC) and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) data have been challenging mainly due to the small number of proteins in an experiment and the lack of reliable inherent control markers. In this study, we compare eight diferent normalization methods for LC and variance stabilization. Te invariant marker set concept was frst applied to the normalization of high-throughput gene expression data. A set of “invariant” markers are selected to create a virtual reference sample. Ten all the samples are normalized to the virtual reference. We propose a variant of this method in the context of RPPA data normalization and compare it with seven other normalization methods previously reported in the literature. Te invariant marker set method performs well with respect to LC, variance stabilization and association with the immunohistochemistry/forescence in situ hybridization data for three key markers in breast tumor samples, while the other methods have inferior performance. Te proposed method is a promising approach for improving the quality of RPPA data.

KW - Normalization

KW - Proteomics

KW - Reverse-phase protein array

KW - RPPA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908504154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908504154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4137/CIn.s13329

DO - 10.4137/CIn.s13329

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908504154

VL - 13

SP - 109

EP - 117

JO - Cancer Informatics

JF - Cancer Informatics

SN - 1176-9351

ER -