A comparison of sleep detection by wrist actigraphy, behavioral response, and polysomnography

Mary L. Blood, Robert Sack, David C. Percy, Julie C. Pen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

128 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two alternative methods for detecting sleep, wrist actigraphy (ACT) and behavioral response monitoring (BRM), were compared to polysomnography (PSG). In the BRM paradigm, a threshold intensity visual or auditory stimulus generated by a palm-top computer was presented about once per minute, and subjects pressed a microswitch if the stimulus was detected. A response within 5 seconds of the stimulus was scored as 'wake' and a failure to respond as 'sleep.' Four males and four females underwent two nights of simultaneous in-home PSG, BRM, and ACT. Each night, subjects underwent a protocol designed to generate five sleep latency trials. Subjects were awakened by alarm clocks at approximately 1-hour intervals and remained awake for 10 minutes before returning to bed for another sleep onset latency (SOL) trial. Minute-by-minute comparisons were made for PSG versus ACT and BRM. All measures were fairly sensitive in detecting sleep, but BRM was more accurate in determining SOL and subsequent wakefulness. Behavioral response monitoring using a tone resulted in more responses and arousals prior to and during light stages of sleep than BRM using a light. It is concluded that BRM has some important advantages as a simple, minimally invasive method for monitoring sleep.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)388-395
Number of pages8
JournalSleep
Volume20
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Actigraphy
Polysomnography
Wrist
Sleep
Handheld Computers
Light
Wakefulness
Sleep Stages
Arousal

Keywords

  • Actigraphy
  • Behavioral responses
  • External stimuli
  • Insomnia
  • Sleep disorders
  • Sleep onset
  • Sleep recording

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Blood, M. L., Sack, R., Percy, D. C., & Pen, J. C. (1997). A comparison of sleep detection by wrist actigraphy, behavioral response, and polysomnography. Sleep, 20(6), 388-395.

A comparison of sleep detection by wrist actigraphy, behavioral response, and polysomnography. / Blood, Mary L.; Sack, Robert; Percy, David C.; Pen, Julie C.

In: Sleep, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1997, p. 388-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blood, ML, Sack, R, Percy, DC & Pen, JC 1997, 'A comparison of sleep detection by wrist actigraphy, behavioral response, and polysomnography', Sleep, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 388-395.
Blood, Mary L. ; Sack, Robert ; Percy, David C. ; Pen, Julie C. / A comparison of sleep detection by wrist actigraphy, behavioral response, and polysomnography. In: Sleep. 1997 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 388-395.
@article{bc24ae75f62e4728b00966230e43a485,
title = "A comparison of sleep detection by wrist actigraphy, behavioral response, and polysomnography",
abstract = "Two alternative methods for detecting sleep, wrist actigraphy (ACT) and behavioral response monitoring (BRM), were compared to polysomnography (PSG). In the BRM paradigm, a threshold intensity visual or auditory stimulus generated by a palm-top computer was presented about once per minute, and subjects pressed a microswitch if the stimulus was detected. A response within 5 seconds of the stimulus was scored as 'wake' and a failure to respond as 'sleep.' Four males and four females underwent two nights of simultaneous in-home PSG, BRM, and ACT. Each night, subjects underwent a protocol designed to generate five sleep latency trials. Subjects were awakened by alarm clocks at approximately 1-hour intervals and remained awake for 10 minutes before returning to bed for another sleep onset latency (SOL) trial. Minute-by-minute comparisons were made for PSG versus ACT and BRM. All measures were fairly sensitive in detecting sleep, but BRM was more accurate in determining SOL and subsequent wakefulness. Behavioral response monitoring using a tone resulted in more responses and arousals prior to and during light stages of sleep than BRM using a light. It is concluded that BRM has some important advantages as a simple, minimally invasive method for monitoring sleep.",
keywords = "Actigraphy, Behavioral responses, External stimuli, Insomnia, Sleep disorders, Sleep onset, Sleep recording",
author = "Blood, {Mary L.} and Robert Sack and Percy, {David C.} and Pen, {Julie C.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "388--395",
journal = "Sleep",
issn = "0161-8105",
publisher = "American Academy of Sleep Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of sleep detection by wrist actigraphy, behavioral response, and polysomnography

AU - Blood, Mary L.

AU - Sack, Robert

AU - Percy, David C.

AU - Pen, Julie C.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Two alternative methods for detecting sleep, wrist actigraphy (ACT) and behavioral response monitoring (BRM), were compared to polysomnography (PSG). In the BRM paradigm, a threshold intensity visual or auditory stimulus generated by a palm-top computer was presented about once per minute, and subjects pressed a microswitch if the stimulus was detected. A response within 5 seconds of the stimulus was scored as 'wake' and a failure to respond as 'sleep.' Four males and four females underwent two nights of simultaneous in-home PSG, BRM, and ACT. Each night, subjects underwent a protocol designed to generate five sleep latency trials. Subjects were awakened by alarm clocks at approximately 1-hour intervals and remained awake for 10 minutes before returning to bed for another sleep onset latency (SOL) trial. Minute-by-minute comparisons were made for PSG versus ACT and BRM. All measures were fairly sensitive in detecting sleep, but BRM was more accurate in determining SOL and subsequent wakefulness. Behavioral response monitoring using a tone resulted in more responses and arousals prior to and during light stages of sleep than BRM using a light. It is concluded that BRM has some important advantages as a simple, minimally invasive method for monitoring sleep.

AB - Two alternative methods for detecting sleep, wrist actigraphy (ACT) and behavioral response monitoring (BRM), were compared to polysomnography (PSG). In the BRM paradigm, a threshold intensity visual or auditory stimulus generated by a palm-top computer was presented about once per minute, and subjects pressed a microswitch if the stimulus was detected. A response within 5 seconds of the stimulus was scored as 'wake' and a failure to respond as 'sleep.' Four males and four females underwent two nights of simultaneous in-home PSG, BRM, and ACT. Each night, subjects underwent a protocol designed to generate five sleep latency trials. Subjects were awakened by alarm clocks at approximately 1-hour intervals and remained awake for 10 minutes before returning to bed for another sleep onset latency (SOL) trial. Minute-by-minute comparisons were made for PSG versus ACT and BRM. All measures were fairly sensitive in detecting sleep, but BRM was more accurate in determining SOL and subsequent wakefulness. Behavioral response monitoring using a tone resulted in more responses and arousals prior to and during light stages of sleep than BRM using a light. It is concluded that BRM has some important advantages as a simple, minimally invasive method for monitoring sleep.

KW - Actigraphy

KW - Behavioral responses

KW - External stimuli

KW - Insomnia

KW - Sleep disorders

KW - Sleep onset

KW - Sleep recording

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030984208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030984208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9302721

AN - SCOPUS:0030984208

VL - 20

SP - 388

EP - 395

JO - Sleep

JF - Sleep

SN - 0161-8105

IS - 6

ER -