A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research

Clermont E. Dionne, Michael Von Korff, Thomas D. Koepsell, Richard (Rick) Deyo, William E. Barlow, Harvey Checkoway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. We conducted a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up. Objective. To compare pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as measures of outcome among back pain patients. Summary of Background Data. Work status, pain, and functional limitations indices are often considered as interchangeable outcome measures in back pain research. This perspective has been criticized by several authors, who argue that each of these outcome measures reflects a different construct that may vary independently of the others. Methods. The study was conducted on 720 patients, who sought care for back pain in primary care settings of a large health maintenance organization in 1989-90, and were interviewed one month and two years later. X2 analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the accuracy of a pain rating and a modified 16-item Roland-Morris score in classifying patients on work status and on the change in work status over time. Results. Moderate agreement between the pain and functional limitations measures and work status was observed. Pain and functional limitations change scores agreed moderately with improvement in work status, but were poorly associated with decline in work status. Conclusions. Although the pain, functional limitations, and work status indices examined in this study are related, they are not equivalent and should not be regarded as interchangeable. These results argue for a clearer distinction of outcome measures in back pain research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2339-2345
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume24
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain
Research
Health Maintenance Organizations
ROC Curve
Primary Health Care
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Functional limitations
  • Outcome measures
  • Work status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research. / Dionne, Clermont E.; Von Korff, Michael; Koepsell, Thomas D.; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Barlow, William E.; Checkoway, Harvey.

In: Spine, Vol. 24, No. 22, 15.11.1999, p. 2339-2345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dionne, Clermont E. ; Von Korff, Michael ; Koepsell, Thomas D. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Barlow, William E. ; Checkoway, Harvey. / A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research. In: Spine. 1999 ; Vol. 24, No. 22. pp. 2339-2345.
@article{8e0e6d6208a74189952f13b47378789a,
title = "A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research",
abstract = "Study Design. We conducted a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up. Objective. To compare pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as measures of outcome among back pain patients. Summary of Background Data. Work status, pain, and functional limitations indices are often considered as interchangeable outcome measures in back pain research. This perspective has been criticized by several authors, who argue that each of these outcome measures reflects a different construct that may vary independently of the others. Methods. The study was conducted on 720 patients, who sought care for back pain in primary care settings of a large health maintenance organization in 1989-90, and were interviewed one month and two years later. X2 analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the accuracy of a pain rating and a modified 16-item Roland-Morris score in classifying patients on work status and on the change in work status over time. Results. Moderate agreement between the pain and functional limitations measures and work status was observed. Pain and functional limitations change scores agreed moderately with improvement in work status, but were poorly associated with decline in work status. Conclusions. Although the pain, functional limitations, and work status indices examined in this study are related, they are not equivalent and should not be regarded as interchangeable. These results argue for a clearer distinction of outcome measures in back pain research.",
keywords = "Back pain, Functional limitations, Outcome measures, Work status",
author = "Dionne, {Clermont E.} and {Von Korff}, Michael and Koepsell, {Thomas D.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Barlow, {William E.} and Harvey Checkoway",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-199911150-00009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "2339--2345",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research

AU - Dionne, Clermont E.

AU - Von Korff, Michael

AU - Koepsell, Thomas D.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Barlow, William E.

AU - Checkoway, Harvey

PY - 1999/11/15

Y1 - 1999/11/15

N2 - Study Design. We conducted a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up. Objective. To compare pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as measures of outcome among back pain patients. Summary of Background Data. Work status, pain, and functional limitations indices are often considered as interchangeable outcome measures in back pain research. This perspective has been criticized by several authors, who argue that each of these outcome measures reflects a different construct that may vary independently of the others. Methods. The study was conducted on 720 patients, who sought care for back pain in primary care settings of a large health maintenance organization in 1989-90, and were interviewed one month and two years later. X2 analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the accuracy of a pain rating and a modified 16-item Roland-Morris score in classifying patients on work status and on the change in work status over time. Results. Moderate agreement between the pain and functional limitations measures and work status was observed. Pain and functional limitations change scores agreed moderately with improvement in work status, but were poorly associated with decline in work status. Conclusions. Although the pain, functional limitations, and work status indices examined in this study are related, they are not equivalent and should not be regarded as interchangeable. These results argue for a clearer distinction of outcome measures in back pain research.

AB - Study Design. We conducted a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up. Objective. To compare pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as measures of outcome among back pain patients. Summary of Background Data. Work status, pain, and functional limitations indices are often considered as interchangeable outcome measures in back pain research. This perspective has been criticized by several authors, who argue that each of these outcome measures reflects a different construct that may vary independently of the others. Methods. The study was conducted on 720 patients, who sought care for back pain in primary care settings of a large health maintenance organization in 1989-90, and were interviewed one month and two years later. X2 analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the accuracy of a pain rating and a modified 16-item Roland-Morris score in classifying patients on work status and on the change in work status over time. Results. Moderate agreement between the pain and functional limitations measures and work status was observed. Pain and functional limitations change scores agreed moderately with improvement in work status, but were poorly associated with decline in work status. Conclusions. Although the pain, functional limitations, and work status indices examined in this study are related, they are not equivalent and should not be regarded as interchangeable. These results argue for a clearer distinction of outcome measures in back pain research.

KW - Back pain

KW - Functional limitations

KW - Outcome measures

KW - Work status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032707750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032707750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-199911150-00009

DO - 10.1097/00007632-199911150-00009

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 2339

EP - 2345

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 22

ER -