A Comparison of Hepatopathologists' and Community Pathologists' Review of Liver Biopsy Specimens From Patients With Hepatitis C

Maire Robert, Andre N. Sofair, Ann Thomas, Beth Bell, Stephanie Bialek, Christopher Corless, Grace Van Ness, Sharon Huie-White, Nicole Stabach, Atif Zaman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background & Aims: Assessment of liver histology has an important role in the management of chronic liver disease. It is not clear whether there are interobserver variabilities between hepatopathologists and general community pathologists. We evaluated the effect of type of pathologist and biopsy specimen size on interobserver agreement for hepatic fibrosis. Methods: Subjects were identified from a population-based sample of adults from a chronic liver disease surveillance network. Biopsy slides from 391 hepatitis C patients who had undergone liver biopsy were obtained and read by 2 study hepatopathologists blinded to the patients' diagnoses (the gold standard). The interobserver agreement of the fibrosis stage between the hepatopathologists and the general pathologists' report were evaluated by kappa index. Results: There was complete agreement between the study pathologist and community pathologist in 49.9% of biopsy specimens. The overall kappa index across all stages of fibrosis was 0.409, with the best agreement occurring at higher stages of fibrosis (kappa: 0.482 for stage 3, 0.776 for stage 4). Overall agreement was good (kappa, 0.465) when biopsy samples were greater than 1.5 cm in size. The community pathologist understaged fibrosis in 73% of biopsy specimens with disagreement. A total of 26% of patients with stages 2 to 4 fibrosis were understaged by the community pathologist. Conclusions: Results from this population-based study show good overall interobserver agreement between hepatopathologists and general pathologists when determining fibrosis stage in liver biopsy specimens from hepatitis C patients when liver biopsy sizes are adequate. However, community pathologists tended to understage fibrosis, which could keep patients from receiving proper treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-338
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Hepatitis C
Fibrosis
Biopsy
Liver
Liver Diseases
Chronic Disease
Pathologists
Observer Variation
Population
Histology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology

Cite this

A Comparison of Hepatopathologists' and Community Pathologists' Review of Liver Biopsy Specimens From Patients With Hepatitis C. / Robert, Maire; Sofair, Andre N.; Thomas, Ann; Bell, Beth; Bialek, Stephanie; Corless, Christopher; Ness, Grace Van; Huie-White, Sharon; Stabach, Nicole; Zaman, Atif.

In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 7, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 335-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Robert, Maire ; Sofair, Andre N. ; Thomas, Ann ; Bell, Beth ; Bialek, Stephanie ; Corless, Christopher ; Ness, Grace Van ; Huie-White, Sharon ; Stabach, Nicole ; Zaman, Atif. / A Comparison of Hepatopathologists' and Community Pathologists' Review of Liver Biopsy Specimens From Patients With Hepatitis C. In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2009 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 335-338.
@article{3328c07ab62645faa4168101ae2a8982,
title = "A Comparison of Hepatopathologists' and Community Pathologists' Review of Liver Biopsy Specimens From Patients With Hepatitis C",
abstract = "Background & Aims: Assessment of liver histology has an important role in the management of chronic liver disease. It is not clear whether there are interobserver variabilities between hepatopathologists and general community pathologists. We evaluated the effect of type of pathologist and biopsy specimen size on interobserver agreement for hepatic fibrosis. Methods: Subjects were identified from a population-based sample of adults from a chronic liver disease surveillance network. Biopsy slides from 391 hepatitis C patients who had undergone liver biopsy were obtained and read by 2 study hepatopathologists blinded to the patients' diagnoses (the gold standard). The interobserver agreement of the fibrosis stage between the hepatopathologists and the general pathologists' report were evaluated by kappa index. Results: There was complete agreement between the study pathologist and community pathologist in 49.9{\%} of biopsy specimens. The overall kappa index across all stages of fibrosis was 0.409, with the best agreement occurring at higher stages of fibrosis (kappa: 0.482 for stage 3, 0.776 for stage 4). Overall agreement was good (kappa, 0.465) when biopsy samples were greater than 1.5 cm in size. The community pathologist understaged fibrosis in 73{\%} of biopsy specimens with disagreement. A total of 26{\%} of patients with stages 2 to 4 fibrosis were understaged by the community pathologist. Conclusions: Results from this population-based study show good overall interobserver agreement between hepatopathologists and general pathologists when determining fibrosis stage in liver biopsy specimens from hepatitis C patients when liver biopsy sizes are adequate. However, community pathologists tended to understage fibrosis, which could keep patients from receiving proper treatment.",
author = "Maire Robert and Sofair, {Andre N.} and Ann Thomas and Beth Bell and Stephanie Bialek and Christopher Corless and Ness, {Grace Van} and Sharon Huie-White and Nicole Stabach and Atif Zaman",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.cgh.2008.11.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "335--338",
journal = "Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "1542-3565",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Hepatopathologists' and Community Pathologists' Review of Liver Biopsy Specimens From Patients With Hepatitis C

AU - Robert, Maire

AU - Sofair, Andre N.

AU - Thomas, Ann

AU - Bell, Beth

AU - Bialek, Stephanie

AU - Corless, Christopher

AU - Ness, Grace Van

AU - Huie-White, Sharon

AU - Stabach, Nicole

AU - Zaman, Atif

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Background & Aims: Assessment of liver histology has an important role in the management of chronic liver disease. It is not clear whether there are interobserver variabilities between hepatopathologists and general community pathologists. We evaluated the effect of type of pathologist and biopsy specimen size on interobserver agreement for hepatic fibrosis. Methods: Subjects were identified from a population-based sample of adults from a chronic liver disease surveillance network. Biopsy slides from 391 hepatitis C patients who had undergone liver biopsy were obtained and read by 2 study hepatopathologists blinded to the patients' diagnoses (the gold standard). The interobserver agreement of the fibrosis stage between the hepatopathologists and the general pathologists' report were evaluated by kappa index. Results: There was complete agreement between the study pathologist and community pathologist in 49.9% of biopsy specimens. The overall kappa index across all stages of fibrosis was 0.409, with the best agreement occurring at higher stages of fibrosis (kappa: 0.482 for stage 3, 0.776 for stage 4). Overall agreement was good (kappa, 0.465) when biopsy samples were greater than 1.5 cm in size. The community pathologist understaged fibrosis in 73% of biopsy specimens with disagreement. A total of 26% of patients with stages 2 to 4 fibrosis were understaged by the community pathologist. Conclusions: Results from this population-based study show good overall interobserver agreement between hepatopathologists and general pathologists when determining fibrosis stage in liver biopsy specimens from hepatitis C patients when liver biopsy sizes are adequate. However, community pathologists tended to understage fibrosis, which could keep patients from receiving proper treatment.

AB - Background & Aims: Assessment of liver histology has an important role in the management of chronic liver disease. It is not clear whether there are interobserver variabilities between hepatopathologists and general community pathologists. We evaluated the effect of type of pathologist and biopsy specimen size on interobserver agreement for hepatic fibrosis. Methods: Subjects were identified from a population-based sample of adults from a chronic liver disease surveillance network. Biopsy slides from 391 hepatitis C patients who had undergone liver biopsy were obtained and read by 2 study hepatopathologists blinded to the patients' diagnoses (the gold standard). The interobserver agreement of the fibrosis stage between the hepatopathologists and the general pathologists' report were evaluated by kappa index. Results: There was complete agreement between the study pathologist and community pathologist in 49.9% of biopsy specimens. The overall kappa index across all stages of fibrosis was 0.409, with the best agreement occurring at higher stages of fibrosis (kappa: 0.482 for stage 3, 0.776 for stage 4). Overall agreement was good (kappa, 0.465) when biopsy samples were greater than 1.5 cm in size. The community pathologist understaged fibrosis in 73% of biopsy specimens with disagreement. A total of 26% of patients with stages 2 to 4 fibrosis were understaged by the community pathologist. Conclusions: Results from this population-based study show good overall interobserver agreement between hepatopathologists and general pathologists when determining fibrosis stage in liver biopsy specimens from hepatitis C patients when liver biopsy sizes are adequate. However, community pathologists tended to understage fibrosis, which could keep patients from receiving proper treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60949113028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60949113028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.11.029

DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.11.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 19138761

AN - SCOPUS:60949113028

VL - 7

SP - 335

EP - 338

JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 1542-3565

IS - 3

ER -