A comparison of free-standing versus co-located long-term acute care hospitals

Jeremy M. Kahn, Amber E. Barnato, Judith R. Lave, Francis Pike, Lisa A. Weissfeld, Tri Q. Le, Derek C. Angus, Jeffrey A. Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Long-term acute care hospitals (LTACs) provide specialized treatment for patients with chronic critical illness. Increasingly LTACs are co-located within traditional short-stay hospitals rather than operated as free-standing facilities, which may affect LTAC utilization patterns and outcomes. Methods We compared free-standing and co-located LTACs using 2005 data from the United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We used bivariate analyses to examine patient characteristics and timing of LTAC transfer, and used propensity matching and multivariable regression to examine mortality, readmissions, and costs after transfer. Results Of 379 LTACs in our sample, 192 (50.7%) were free-standing and 187 (49.3%) were co-located in a short-stay hospital. Co-located LTACs were smaller (median bed size: 34 vs. 66, p <0.001) and more likely to be for-profit (72.2% v. 68.8%, p = 0.001) than freestanding LTACs. Co-located LTACs admitted patients later in their hospital course (average time prior to transfer: 15.5 days vs. 14.0 days) and were more likely to admit patients for ventilator weaning (15.9% vs. 12.4%). In the multivariate propensity-matched analysis, patients in co-located LTACs experienced higher 180-day mortality (adjusted relative risk: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.11, p = 0.04) but lower readmission rates (adjusted relative risk: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.98, p = 0.02). Costs were similar between the two hospital types (mean difference in costs within 180 days of transfer: -$3,580, 95% CI: -$8,720 -$1,550, p = 0.17). Conclusions Compared to patients in free-standing LTACs, patients in co-located LTACs experience slightly higher mortality but lower readmission rates, with no change in overall resource use as measured by 180 day costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere139742
JournalPloS one
Volume10
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 6 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of free-standing versus co-located long-term acute care hospitals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kahn, J. M., Barnato, A. E., Lave, J. R., Pike, F., Weissfeld, L. A., Le, T. Q., Angus, D. C., & Gold, J. A. (2015). A comparison of free-standing versus co-located long-term acute care hospitals. PloS one, 10(10), [e139742]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139742