A Comparison of Five Radiographic Systems to D-Speed Film in the Detection of Artificial Bone Lesions

David L. Hadley; Karan J. Replogle; John C. Kirkam; Al M. Best

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.018

A Comparison of Five Radiographic Systems to D-Speed Film in the Detection of Artificial Bone Lesions

David L. Hadley, Karan J. Replogle, John C. Kirkam, Al M. Best

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare three direct digital sensors (Kodak 6100 [Rochester, NY], Schick CDR [Long Island City, NY], and Dexis PerfectSize [Alpharetta, GA]), a phosphor plate system (OpTime; Milwaukee, WI), and F-speed film to standard D-speed film in the detection of artificial bone lesions prepared in mandible bone sections. Artificial bone lesions were prepared at varying depths in the cortical bone. Radiographs were randomly presented to nine different observers. Logistic regression analysis indicated significant differences in lesion detection among the radiographic systems at the mean percentage of cortical bone remaining. The Kodak filtered, Schick filtered, OpTime unfiltered, Schick unfiltered, and Dexis filtered images were significantly better at lesion detection compared with D-speed film.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1111-1114
Number of pages	4
Journal	Journal of endodontics
Volume	34
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.018
State	Published - Sep 2008
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Artificial bone lesions
D-speed film
Dexis
Kodak
OpTime
Schick
comparison lesions
intraoral
mandible
radiographic comparison
radiographic systems
simulated bone lesions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Dentistry(all)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.018

Cite this

@article{29bf1003eb734e4988bf25cc71e2c518,

title = "A Comparison of Five Radiographic Systems to D-Speed Film in the Detection of Artificial Bone Lesions",

abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare three direct digital sensors (Kodak 6100 [Rochester, NY], Schick CDR [Long Island City, NY], and Dexis PerfectSize [Alpharetta, GA]), a phosphor plate system (OpTime; Milwaukee, WI), and F-speed film to standard D-speed film in the detection of artificial bone lesions prepared in mandible bone sections. Artificial bone lesions were prepared at varying depths in the cortical bone. Radiographs were randomly presented to nine different observers. Logistic regression analysis indicated significant differences in lesion detection among the radiographic systems at the mean percentage of cortical bone remaining. The Kodak filtered, Schick filtered, OpTime unfiltered, Schick unfiltered, and Dexis filtered images were significantly better at lesion detection compared with D-speed film.",

keywords = "Artificial bone lesions, D-speed film, Dexis, Kodak, OpTime, Schick, comparison lesions, intraoral, mandible, radiographic comparison, radiographic systems, simulated bone lesions",

author = "Hadley, {David L.} and Replogle, {Karan J.} and Kirkam, {John C.} and Best, {Al M.}",

year = "2008",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.018",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "34",

pages = "1111--1114",

journal = "Journal of Endodontics",

issn = "0099-2399",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Five Radiographic Systems to D-Speed Film in the Detection of Artificial Bone Lesions

AU - Hadley, David L.

AU - Replogle, Karan J.

AU - Kirkam, John C.

AU - Best, Al M.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare three direct digital sensors (Kodak 6100 [Rochester, NY], Schick CDR [Long Island City, NY], and Dexis PerfectSize [Alpharetta, GA]), a phosphor plate system (OpTime; Milwaukee, WI), and F-speed film to standard D-speed film in the detection of artificial bone lesions prepared in mandible bone sections. Artificial bone lesions were prepared at varying depths in the cortical bone. Radiographs were randomly presented to nine different observers. Logistic regression analysis indicated significant differences in lesion detection among the radiographic systems at the mean percentage of cortical bone remaining. The Kodak filtered, Schick filtered, OpTime unfiltered, Schick unfiltered, and Dexis filtered images were significantly better at lesion detection compared with D-speed film.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare three direct digital sensors (Kodak 6100 [Rochester, NY], Schick CDR [Long Island City, NY], and Dexis PerfectSize [Alpharetta, GA]), a phosphor plate system (OpTime; Milwaukee, WI), and F-speed film to standard D-speed film in the detection of artificial bone lesions prepared in mandible bone sections. Artificial bone lesions were prepared at varying depths in the cortical bone. Radiographs were randomly presented to nine different observers. Logistic regression analysis indicated significant differences in lesion detection among the radiographic systems at the mean percentage of cortical bone remaining. The Kodak filtered, Schick filtered, OpTime unfiltered, Schick unfiltered, and Dexis filtered images were significantly better at lesion detection compared with D-speed film.

KW - Artificial bone lesions

KW - D-speed film

KW - Dexis

KW - Kodak

KW - OpTime

KW - Schick

KW - comparison lesions

KW - intraoral

KW - mandible

KW - radiographic comparison

KW - radiographic systems

KW - simulated bone lesions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49349112908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49349112908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.018

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 18718376

AN - SCOPUS:49349112908

SN - 0099-2399

VL - 34

SP - 1111

EP - 1114

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

IS - 9

ER -

A Comparison of Five Radiographic Systems to D-Speed Film in the Detection of Artificial Bone Lesions

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this