A comparative study of 2 imaging techniques for the diagnosis of condylar fractures in children

Guillermo E. Chacon, Kenneth H. Dawson, Robert (Bob) Myall, O. Ross Beirne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to compare the sensitivity and specificity of panoramic radiographs with those of coronal computed tomography (CT) scans in the diagnosis of mandibular condylar fractures in the pediatric population. Methods: Medical, dental, and radiographic records of patients who presented between 1995 and 2000 were evaluated for injuries involving the mandibular condyle. The sample included 22 males and 15 females with ages ranging from 2 to 15 years (mean, 8 years). Control subjects were added and matched by age and gender. The panoramic radiographs were blocked to allow separate evaluation of each condyle. Representative images from the CT scans were selected and individually photographed for projection. Both sets of images were evaluated by 4 groups of examiners: oral and maxillofacial (OMF) surgeons who regularly deal with pediatric trauma (n = 2), community OMF surgeons who had been out of training for at least 5 years (n = 6), OMF radiologists (n = 3), and OMF surgery residents (n = 6). Each image was shown for 20 seconds and the examiners were given 3 options to choose: 1) fracture, 2) no fracture, and 3) uncertain. Results: The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT scanning was 90% (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 87%), and that of panoramic radiographs was 73% (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 77%). Of interest, the most experienced clinicians were also those most likely to respond that panoramic films were not diagnostic. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using χ2 analysis. The differences for sensitivity measurements using the CT scan were not statistically significant (P > .1). However, the differences in sensitivity measurements using the panoramic radiographs and the specificity measurements using both the CT and panoramic radiographs were statistically significant (P <.05). Conclusions: CT scans provide consistently greater accuracy of diagnosis, sensitivity, and specificity than panoramic radiographs in the assessment of children suspected of having condylar fractures. In view of the high rate of false-negative and false-positive results associated with panoramic radiographs, coronal CT scans should be considered routine investigation in these patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)668-672
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume61
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2003

Fingerprint

Tomography
Oral Surgery
Dental Records
Pediatrics
Mandibular Condyle
Mandibular Fractures
Sensitivity and Specificity
Wounds and Injuries
Bone and Bones
Population
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Surgery

Cite this

A comparative study of 2 imaging techniques for the diagnosis of condylar fractures in children. / Chacon, Guillermo E.; Dawson, Kenneth H.; Myall, Robert (Bob); Beirne, O. Ross.

In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 61, No. 6, 01.06.2003, p. 668-672.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chacon, Guillermo E. ; Dawson, Kenneth H. ; Myall, Robert (Bob) ; Beirne, O. Ross. / A comparative study of 2 imaging techniques for the diagnosis of condylar fractures in children. In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2003 ; Vol. 61, No. 6. pp. 668-672.
@article{3876c889e97243e9842dac6c7164a196,
title = "A comparative study of 2 imaging techniques for the diagnosis of condylar fractures in children",
abstract = "Purpose: We sought to compare the sensitivity and specificity of panoramic radiographs with those of coronal computed tomography (CT) scans in the diagnosis of mandibular condylar fractures in the pediatric population. Methods: Medical, dental, and radiographic records of patients who presented between 1995 and 2000 were evaluated for injuries involving the mandibular condyle. The sample included 22 males and 15 females with ages ranging from 2 to 15 years (mean, 8 years). Control subjects were added and matched by age and gender. The panoramic radiographs were blocked to allow separate evaluation of each condyle. Representative images from the CT scans were selected and individually photographed for projection. Both sets of images were evaluated by 4 groups of examiners: oral and maxillofacial (OMF) surgeons who regularly deal with pediatric trauma (n = 2), community OMF surgeons who had been out of training for at least 5 years (n = 6), OMF radiologists (n = 3), and OMF surgery residents (n = 6). Each image was shown for 20 seconds and the examiners were given 3 options to choose: 1) fracture, 2) no fracture, and 3) uncertain. Results: The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT scanning was 90{\%} (sensitivity, 92{\%}; specificity, 87{\%}), and that of panoramic radiographs was 73{\%} (sensitivity, 70{\%}; specificity, 77{\%}). Of interest, the most experienced clinicians were also those most likely to respond that panoramic films were not diagnostic. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using χ2 analysis. The differences for sensitivity measurements using the CT scan were not statistically significant (P > .1). However, the differences in sensitivity measurements using the panoramic radiographs and the specificity measurements using both the CT and panoramic radiographs were statistically significant (P <.05). Conclusions: CT scans provide consistently greater accuracy of diagnosis, sensitivity, and specificity than panoramic radiographs in the assessment of children suspected of having condylar fractures. In view of the high rate of false-negative and false-positive results associated with panoramic radiographs, coronal CT scans should be considered routine investigation in these patients.",
author = "Chacon, {Guillermo E.} and Dawson, {Kenneth H.} and Myall, {Robert (Bob)} and Beirne, {O. Ross}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/joms.2003.50134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "668--672",
journal = "Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0278-2391",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of 2 imaging techniques for the diagnosis of condylar fractures in children

AU - Chacon, Guillermo E.

AU - Dawson, Kenneth H.

AU - Myall, Robert (Bob)

AU - Beirne, O. Ross

PY - 2003/6/1

Y1 - 2003/6/1

N2 - Purpose: We sought to compare the sensitivity and specificity of panoramic radiographs with those of coronal computed tomography (CT) scans in the diagnosis of mandibular condylar fractures in the pediatric population. Methods: Medical, dental, and radiographic records of patients who presented between 1995 and 2000 were evaluated for injuries involving the mandibular condyle. The sample included 22 males and 15 females with ages ranging from 2 to 15 years (mean, 8 years). Control subjects were added and matched by age and gender. The panoramic radiographs were blocked to allow separate evaluation of each condyle. Representative images from the CT scans were selected and individually photographed for projection. Both sets of images were evaluated by 4 groups of examiners: oral and maxillofacial (OMF) surgeons who regularly deal with pediatric trauma (n = 2), community OMF surgeons who had been out of training for at least 5 years (n = 6), OMF radiologists (n = 3), and OMF surgery residents (n = 6). Each image was shown for 20 seconds and the examiners were given 3 options to choose: 1) fracture, 2) no fracture, and 3) uncertain. Results: The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT scanning was 90% (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 87%), and that of panoramic radiographs was 73% (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 77%). Of interest, the most experienced clinicians were also those most likely to respond that panoramic films were not diagnostic. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using χ2 analysis. The differences for sensitivity measurements using the CT scan were not statistically significant (P > .1). However, the differences in sensitivity measurements using the panoramic radiographs and the specificity measurements using both the CT and panoramic radiographs were statistically significant (P <.05). Conclusions: CT scans provide consistently greater accuracy of diagnosis, sensitivity, and specificity than panoramic radiographs in the assessment of children suspected of having condylar fractures. In view of the high rate of false-negative and false-positive results associated with panoramic radiographs, coronal CT scans should be considered routine investigation in these patients.

AB - Purpose: We sought to compare the sensitivity and specificity of panoramic radiographs with those of coronal computed tomography (CT) scans in the diagnosis of mandibular condylar fractures in the pediatric population. Methods: Medical, dental, and radiographic records of patients who presented between 1995 and 2000 were evaluated for injuries involving the mandibular condyle. The sample included 22 males and 15 females with ages ranging from 2 to 15 years (mean, 8 years). Control subjects were added and matched by age and gender. The panoramic radiographs were blocked to allow separate evaluation of each condyle. Representative images from the CT scans were selected and individually photographed for projection. Both sets of images were evaluated by 4 groups of examiners: oral and maxillofacial (OMF) surgeons who regularly deal with pediatric trauma (n = 2), community OMF surgeons who had been out of training for at least 5 years (n = 6), OMF radiologists (n = 3), and OMF surgery residents (n = 6). Each image was shown for 20 seconds and the examiners were given 3 options to choose: 1) fracture, 2) no fracture, and 3) uncertain. Results: The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT scanning was 90% (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 87%), and that of panoramic radiographs was 73% (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 77%). Of interest, the most experienced clinicians were also those most likely to respond that panoramic films were not diagnostic. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using χ2 analysis. The differences for sensitivity measurements using the CT scan were not statistically significant (P > .1). However, the differences in sensitivity measurements using the panoramic radiographs and the specificity measurements using both the CT and panoramic radiographs were statistically significant (P <.05). Conclusions: CT scans provide consistently greater accuracy of diagnosis, sensitivity, and specificity than panoramic radiographs in the assessment of children suspected of having condylar fractures. In view of the high rate of false-negative and false-positive results associated with panoramic radiographs, coronal CT scans should be considered routine investigation in these patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037849856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037849856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/joms.2003.50134

DO - 10.1053/joms.2003.50134

M3 - Article

C2 - 12796873

AN - SCOPUS:0037849856

VL - 61

SP - 668

EP - 672

JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0278-2391

IS - 6

ER -