A comparative analysis of National Institutes of Health research support for emergency medicine – 2008 to 2017

David H. Jang, Phillip D. Levy, Frances S. Shofer, Benjamin Sun, Jeremy Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to compare National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding received by Emergency Medicine (EM) to the specialties of Family Medicine, Neurology, Orthopedics, Pediatrics and Psychiatry over the 10-year period from 2008 to 2017. Methods: The NIH database of both submitted and funded NIH applications were queried and crossed with the departmental affiliation of the principal investigator. Research Grants were defined by the following activity codes: R, P, M, S, K, U (excluding UC6), DP1, DP2, DP3, DP4, DP5, D42 and G12. Derived data were further analyzed using information from the Association of American Medical Colleges to determine the relationship between the number of awards and the size of respective teaching and research faculty. Results: From 2008 to 2017, there were a total of 14,676 funded grants across included specialties with total monetary support of $6.002 billion. Of these funded grants, 250 (1.7%) were from EM principal investigators which corresponded to total support of $89,453,635 (1.5% of overall dollars). There was an increase in total support after 2012 in EM, however when compared to the other specialties, EM investigators submitted relatively fewer grants and awarded grants were funded by a wider distribution of NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs). Conclusions: Compared to other select specialties, EM investigators accounted for a small proportion of grants submitted and funded over the past decade. Though findings illustrate promising trends, to foster success, more submitted grant applications are needed from within EM along with systematic approaches to support faculty members in their pursuit of NIH funding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Organized Financing
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Research Personnel
American Medical Association
Neurology
Research
Orthopedics
Psychiatry
Teaching
Medicine
Databases
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Emergency Medicine
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Research support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

A comparative analysis of National Institutes of Health research support for emergency medicine – 2008 to 2017. / Jang, David H.; Levy, Phillip D.; Shofer, Frances S.; Sun, Benjamin; Brown, Jeremy.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bad9be6cbf454438954e30988d3e638d,
title = "A comparative analysis of National Institutes of Health research support for emergency medicine – 2008 to 2017",
abstract = "Objectives: We sought to compare National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding received by Emergency Medicine (EM) to the specialties of Family Medicine, Neurology, Orthopedics, Pediatrics and Psychiatry over the 10-year period from 2008 to 2017. Methods: The NIH database of both submitted and funded NIH applications were queried and crossed with the departmental affiliation of the principal investigator. Research Grants were defined by the following activity codes: R, P, M, S, K, U (excluding UC6), DP1, DP2, DP3, DP4, DP5, D42 and G12. Derived data were further analyzed using information from the Association of American Medical Colleges to determine the relationship between the number of awards and the size of respective teaching and research faculty. Results: From 2008 to 2017, there were a total of 14,676 funded grants across included specialties with total monetary support of $6.002 billion. Of these funded grants, 250 (1.7{\%}) were from EM principal investigators which corresponded to total support of $89,453,635 (1.5{\%} of overall dollars). There was an increase in total support after 2012 in EM, however when compared to the other specialties, EM investigators submitted relatively fewer grants and awarded grants were funded by a wider distribution of NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs). Conclusions: Compared to other select specialties, EM investigators accounted for a small proportion of grants submitted and funded over the past decade. Though findings illustrate promising trends, to foster success, more submitted grant applications are needed from within EM along with systematic approaches to support faculty members in their pursuit of NIH funding.",
keywords = "Emergency Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Research support",
author = "Jang, {David H.} and Levy, {Phillip D.} and Shofer, {Frances S.} and Benjamin Sun and Jeremy Brown",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.045",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative analysis of National Institutes of Health research support for emergency medicine – 2008 to 2017

AU - Jang, David H.

AU - Levy, Phillip D.

AU - Shofer, Frances S.

AU - Sun, Benjamin

AU - Brown, Jeremy

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives: We sought to compare National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding received by Emergency Medicine (EM) to the specialties of Family Medicine, Neurology, Orthopedics, Pediatrics and Psychiatry over the 10-year period from 2008 to 2017. Methods: The NIH database of both submitted and funded NIH applications were queried and crossed with the departmental affiliation of the principal investigator. Research Grants were defined by the following activity codes: R, P, M, S, K, U (excluding UC6), DP1, DP2, DP3, DP4, DP5, D42 and G12. Derived data were further analyzed using information from the Association of American Medical Colleges to determine the relationship between the number of awards and the size of respective teaching and research faculty. Results: From 2008 to 2017, there were a total of 14,676 funded grants across included specialties with total monetary support of $6.002 billion. Of these funded grants, 250 (1.7%) were from EM principal investigators which corresponded to total support of $89,453,635 (1.5% of overall dollars). There was an increase in total support after 2012 in EM, however when compared to the other specialties, EM investigators submitted relatively fewer grants and awarded grants were funded by a wider distribution of NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs). Conclusions: Compared to other select specialties, EM investigators accounted for a small proportion of grants submitted and funded over the past decade. Though findings illustrate promising trends, to foster success, more submitted grant applications are needed from within EM along with systematic approaches to support faculty members in their pursuit of NIH funding.

AB - Objectives: We sought to compare National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding received by Emergency Medicine (EM) to the specialties of Family Medicine, Neurology, Orthopedics, Pediatrics and Psychiatry over the 10-year period from 2008 to 2017. Methods: The NIH database of both submitted and funded NIH applications were queried and crossed with the departmental affiliation of the principal investigator. Research Grants were defined by the following activity codes: R, P, M, S, K, U (excluding UC6), DP1, DP2, DP3, DP4, DP5, D42 and G12. Derived data were further analyzed using information from the Association of American Medical Colleges to determine the relationship between the number of awards and the size of respective teaching and research faculty. Results: From 2008 to 2017, there were a total of 14,676 funded grants across included specialties with total monetary support of $6.002 billion. Of these funded grants, 250 (1.7%) were from EM principal investigators which corresponded to total support of $89,453,635 (1.5% of overall dollars). There was an increase in total support after 2012 in EM, however when compared to the other specialties, EM investigators submitted relatively fewer grants and awarded grants were funded by a wider distribution of NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs). Conclusions: Compared to other select specialties, EM investigators accounted for a small proportion of grants submitted and funded over the past decade. Though findings illustrate promising trends, to foster success, more submitted grant applications are needed from within EM along with systematic approaches to support faculty members in their pursuit of NIH funding.

KW - Emergency Medicine

KW - National Institutes of Health

KW - Research support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059114269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059114269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.045

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.045

M3 - Article

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

ER -