A biomechanical analysis of atlantoaxial stabilization methods using a bovine model

C1/C2 fixation analysis

M. D. Smith, G. Kotzar, Jung Yoo, H. Bohlman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reliability and initial postoperative stability of six widely used C1- C2 surgical constructs were evaluated by nondestructive biomechanical testing of ten fresh bovine upper cervical spine segments. The six fixation techniques were the simple midline sublaminar C1 wiring (SMW), the modified Gallie wiring (MGW), the Brook wedge arthrodesis (BWA), the bilateral lateral mass screw (LMS), and the Clark arthrodesis without (CWO) and with (CW) the adjunctive use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. Instability was produced by resection of the base of the dens. Intact, destabilized, and instrumented constructs were tested in unconstrained flexion, extension, torsion, anterior, and posterior shear forces. The LMS and CW techniques proved the most effective in achieving C1-C2 stability. Sublaminar C2 wiring methods tended to have greater torsional and shear stiffness. Less rigid fixation techniques frequently loosened. All non-PMMA-enhanced wired constructs failed to restore the ability to adequately resist the posterior translation of C1 on C2. Stabilization of an unstable atlantoaxial articulation is best accomplished by a lateral mass screw or sublaminar C1- C2 PMMA-enhanced technique. Other techniques provided less consistent and reliable surgical fixation. Because of the inadequacy of wired constructs to resist posterior shear in patients with this instability pattern, the usual treatment may need to be modified to include more prolonged or protective external immobilization or more rigid fixation techniques. Although less rigid, the SMW and the MGW techniques are safer because they require less- frequent passage of sublaminar wires, avoid potential problems with PMMA, and obviate the hazards of further lateral dissection and insertion of the transarticular screws.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-295
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number290
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Polymethyl Methacrylate
Arthrodesis
Immobilization
Dissection
Spine
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

A biomechanical analysis of atlantoaxial stabilization methods using a bovine model : C1/C2 fixation analysis. / Smith, M. D.; Kotzar, G.; Yoo, Jung; Bohlman, H.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 290, 1993, p. 285-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc6cbc72570c43f3bb3083ae9ab8af59,
title = "A biomechanical analysis of atlantoaxial stabilization methods using a bovine model: C1/C2 fixation analysis",
abstract = "The reliability and initial postoperative stability of six widely used C1- C2 surgical constructs were evaluated by nondestructive biomechanical testing of ten fresh bovine upper cervical spine segments. The six fixation techniques were the simple midline sublaminar C1 wiring (SMW), the modified Gallie wiring (MGW), the Brook wedge arthrodesis (BWA), the bilateral lateral mass screw (LMS), and the Clark arthrodesis without (CWO) and with (CW) the adjunctive use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. Instability was produced by resection of the base of the dens. Intact, destabilized, and instrumented constructs were tested in unconstrained flexion, extension, torsion, anterior, and posterior shear forces. The LMS and CW techniques proved the most effective in achieving C1-C2 stability. Sublaminar C2 wiring methods tended to have greater torsional and shear stiffness. Less rigid fixation techniques frequently loosened. All non-PMMA-enhanced wired constructs failed to restore the ability to adequately resist the posterior translation of C1 on C2. Stabilization of an unstable atlantoaxial articulation is best accomplished by a lateral mass screw or sublaminar C1- C2 PMMA-enhanced technique. Other techniques provided less consistent and reliable surgical fixation. Because of the inadequacy of wired constructs to resist posterior shear in patients with this instability pattern, the usual treatment may need to be modified to include more prolonged or protective external immobilization or more rigid fixation techniques. Although less rigid, the SMW and the MGW techniques are safer because they require less- frequent passage of sublaminar wires, avoid potential problems with PMMA, and obviate the hazards of further lateral dissection and insertion of the transarticular screws.",
author = "Smith, {M. D.} and G. Kotzar and Jung Yoo and H. Bohlman",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "285--295",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "290",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A biomechanical analysis of atlantoaxial stabilization methods using a bovine model

T2 - C1/C2 fixation analysis

AU - Smith, M. D.

AU - Kotzar, G.

AU - Yoo, Jung

AU - Bohlman, H.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The reliability and initial postoperative stability of six widely used C1- C2 surgical constructs were evaluated by nondestructive biomechanical testing of ten fresh bovine upper cervical spine segments. The six fixation techniques were the simple midline sublaminar C1 wiring (SMW), the modified Gallie wiring (MGW), the Brook wedge arthrodesis (BWA), the bilateral lateral mass screw (LMS), and the Clark arthrodesis without (CWO) and with (CW) the adjunctive use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. Instability was produced by resection of the base of the dens. Intact, destabilized, and instrumented constructs were tested in unconstrained flexion, extension, torsion, anterior, and posterior shear forces. The LMS and CW techniques proved the most effective in achieving C1-C2 stability. Sublaminar C2 wiring methods tended to have greater torsional and shear stiffness. Less rigid fixation techniques frequently loosened. All non-PMMA-enhanced wired constructs failed to restore the ability to adequately resist the posterior translation of C1 on C2. Stabilization of an unstable atlantoaxial articulation is best accomplished by a lateral mass screw or sublaminar C1- C2 PMMA-enhanced technique. Other techniques provided less consistent and reliable surgical fixation. Because of the inadequacy of wired constructs to resist posterior shear in patients with this instability pattern, the usual treatment may need to be modified to include more prolonged or protective external immobilization or more rigid fixation techniques. Although less rigid, the SMW and the MGW techniques are safer because they require less- frequent passage of sublaminar wires, avoid potential problems with PMMA, and obviate the hazards of further lateral dissection and insertion of the transarticular screws.

AB - The reliability and initial postoperative stability of six widely used C1- C2 surgical constructs were evaluated by nondestructive biomechanical testing of ten fresh bovine upper cervical spine segments. The six fixation techniques were the simple midline sublaminar C1 wiring (SMW), the modified Gallie wiring (MGW), the Brook wedge arthrodesis (BWA), the bilateral lateral mass screw (LMS), and the Clark arthrodesis without (CWO) and with (CW) the adjunctive use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. Instability was produced by resection of the base of the dens. Intact, destabilized, and instrumented constructs were tested in unconstrained flexion, extension, torsion, anterior, and posterior shear forces. The LMS and CW techniques proved the most effective in achieving C1-C2 stability. Sublaminar C2 wiring methods tended to have greater torsional and shear stiffness. Less rigid fixation techniques frequently loosened. All non-PMMA-enhanced wired constructs failed to restore the ability to adequately resist the posterior translation of C1 on C2. Stabilization of an unstable atlantoaxial articulation is best accomplished by a lateral mass screw or sublaminar C1- C2 PMMA-enhanced technique. Other techniques provided less consistent and reliable surgical fixation. Because of the inadequacy of wired constructs to resist posterior shear in patients with this instability pattern, the usual treatment may need to be modified to include more prolonged or protective external immobilization or more rigid fixation techniques. Although less rigid, the SMW and the MGW techniques are safer because they require less- frequent passage of sublaminar wires, avoid potential problems with PMMA, and obviate the hazards of further lateral dissection and insertion of the transarticular screws.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027263823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027263823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 285

EP - 295

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 290

ER -