2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group

Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back, Neck Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

154 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Method guideline for systematic reviews of trials of interventions for neck and back pain, and related spinal disorders. Objective. To help authors design, conduct, and report systematic reviews of trials in this field. Summary of Background Data. In 1997, the Cochrane Back Review Group editorial board published the Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews, which was updated in 2003 and in 2009. Since then, new methodological evidence has emerged and standards have changed, therefore it was clear that revisions were needed to the 2009 guideline. In May 2015 the group changed its name to Cochrane Back and Neck. Methods. The editorial board met in September 2014 to review the relevant new methodological evidence and determine how it should be incorporated. Members of the advisory board were consulted. Based on the feedback received, an updated method guideline was prepared and approved by the editorial board. Results. We have updated recommendations in 7 categories: objectives, literature search, selection criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and reporting of results and conclusions. Each category is classified into minimum criteria (mandatory) and further guidance (optional). This update also includes some new guidance for preparation of summary of finding tables and for conducting nonintervention reviews. Conclusion. Citations of previous versions of the method guideline in published scientific articles (1193 in total) suggest that others may find this guideline useful to plan, conduct, or evaluate systematic reviews in the field of back and neck pain, and spinal disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1660-1673
Number of pages14
JournalSpine
Volume40
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 27 2015

Fingerprint

Neck
Guidelines
Neck Pain
Back Pain
Somatoform Disorders
Patient Selection
Names
Research Design

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Cochrane collaboration
  • Meta-analysis
  • Method guideline
  • Neck pain
  • Spinal disorders
  • Systematic reviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group. / Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back, Neck Group.

In: Spine, Vol. 40, No. 21, 27.10.2015, p. 1660-1673.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back, Neck Group 2015, '2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group', Spine, vol. 40, no. 21, pp. 1660-1673. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061
Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back, Neck Group. / 2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group. In: Spine. 2015 ; Vol. 40, No. 21. pp. 1660-1673.
@article{d1d71157cc67456d893e6698768560e3,
title = "2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group",
abstract = "Study Design. Method guideline for systematic reviews of trials of interventions for neck and back pain, and related spinal disorders. Objective. To help authors design, conduct, and report systematic reviews of trials in this field. Summary of Background Data. In 1997, the Cochrane Back Review Group editorial board published the Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews, which was updated in 2003 and in 2009. Since then, new methodological evidence has emerged and standards have changed, therefore it was clear that revisions were needed to the 2009 guideline. In May 2015 the group changed its name to Cochrane Back and Neck. Methods. The editorial board met in September 2014 to review the relevant new methodological evidence and determine how it should be incorporated. Members of the advisory board were consulted. Based on the feedback received, an updated method guideline was prepared and approved by the editorial board. Results. We have updated recommendations in 7 categories: objectives, literature search, selection criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and reporting of results and conclusions. Each category is classified into minimum criteria (mandatory) and further guidance (optional). This update also includes some new guidance for preparation of summary of finding tables and for conducting nonintervention reviews. Conclusion. Citations of previous versions of the method guideline in published scientific articles (1193 in total) suggest that others may find this guideline useful to plan, conduct, or evaluate systematic reviews in the field of back and neck pain, and spinal disorders.",
keywords = "Back pain, Cochrane collaboration, Meta-analysis, Method guideline, Neck pain, Spinal disorders, Systematic reviews",
author = "{Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back, Neck Group} and Furlan, {Andrea D.} and Antti Malmivaara and Roger Chou and Maher, {Chris G.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Mark Schoene and Gert Bronfort and {Van Tulder}, {Maurits W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1660--1673",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group

AU - Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back, Neck Group

AU - Furlan, Andrea D.

AU - Malmivaara, Antti

AU - Chou, Roger

AU - Maher, Chris G.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Schoene, Mark

AU - Bronfort, Gert

AU - Van Tulder, Maurits W.

PY - 2015/10/27

Y1 - 2015/10/27

N2 - Study Design. Method guideline for systematic reviews of trials of interventions for neck and back pain, and related spinal disorders. Objective. To help authors design, conduct, and report systematic reviews of trials in this field. Summary of Background Data. In 1997, the Cochrane Back Review Group editorial board published the Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews, which was updated in 2003 and in 2009. Since then, new methodological evidence has emerged and standards have changed, therefore it was clear that revisions were needed to the 2009 guideline. In May 2015 the group changed its name to Cochrane Back and Neck. Methods. The editorial board met in September 2014 to review the relevant new methodological evidence and determine how it should be incorporated. Members of the advisory board were consulted. Based on the feedback received, an updated method guideline was prepared and approved by the editorial board. Results. We have updated recommendations in 7 categories: objectives, literature search, selection criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and reporting of results and conclusions. Each category is classified into minimum criteria (mandatory) and further guidance (optional). This update also includes some new guidance for preparation of summary of finding tables and for conducting nonintervention reviews. Conclusion. Citations of previous versions of the method guideline in published scientific articles (1193 in total) suggest that others may find this guideline useful to plan, conduct, or evaluate systematic reviews in the field of back and neck pain, and spinal disorders.

AB - Study Design. Method guideline for systematic reviews of trials of interventions for neck and back pain, and related spinal disorders. Objective. To help authors design, conduct, and report systematic reviews of trials in this field. Summary of Background Data. In 1997, the Cochrane Back Review Group editorial board published the Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews, which was updated in 2003 and in 2009. Since then, new methodological evidence has emerged and standards have changed, therefore it was clear that revisions were needed to the 2009 guideline. In May 2015 the group changed its name to Cochrane Back and Neck. Methods. The editorial board met in September 2014 to review the relevant new methodological evidence and determine how it should be incorporated. Members of the advisory board were consulted. Based on the feedback received, an updated method guideline was prepared and approved by the editorial board. Results. We have updated recommendations in 7 categories: objectives, literature search, selection criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and reporting of results and conclusions. Each category is classified into minimum criteria (mandatory) and further guidance (optional). This update also includes some new guidance for preparation of summary of finding tables and for conducting nonintervention reviews. Conclusion. Citations of previous versions of the method guideline in published scientific articles (1193 in total) suggest that others may find this guideline useful to plan, conduct, or evaluate systematic reviews in the field of back and neck pain, and spinal disorders.

KW - Back pain

KW - Cochrane collaboration

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Method guideline

KW - Neck pain

KW - Spinal disorders

KW - Systematic reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946039150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946039150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061

M3 - Article

C2 - 26208232

AN - SCOPUS:84946039150

VL - 40

SP - 1660

EP - 1673

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 21

ER -